2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12970-021-00462-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of carbohydrate and caffeine mouth rinsing on strength, muscular endurance and cognitive performance

Abstract: Background Carbohydrate (CHO) and caffeine (CAF) mouth rinsing have been shown to enhance endurance and sprint performance. However, the effects of CHO and CAF mouth rinsing on muscular and cognitive performance in comparison between male and female athletes are less well-established. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of CHO and CAF rinsing on squat and bench press 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) strength, 3 sets of 40% of 1-RM muscular endurance and cognitive performance in both male… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
17
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for sprints, there were slight differences between groups ( Figure 4 ), but these were not significant either. Some investigations also did not observe a clear effect between CH and placebo in specific performance tests [ 26 , 37 ] or glucose [ 38 ], and some suggest that the use of a 5 s mouthwash with an isoenergetic amount of maltodextrin or glucose may not be beneficial for maximal sprint performance [ 39 ]. Methodological differences between the current study and these other studies, including the number of exercise tests, duration of resistance tests, mouth rinse dosage, resistance intensity, and training status of participants, may explain the disparity in performance and data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for sprints, there were slight differences between groups ( Figure 4 ), but these were not significant either. Some investigations also did not observe a clear effect between CH and placebo in specific performance tests [ 26 , 37 ] or glucose [ 38 ], and some suggest that the use of a 5 s mouthwash with an isoenergetic amount of maltodextrin or glucose may not be beneficial for maximal sprint performance [ 39 ]. Methodological differences between the current study and these other studies, including the number of exercise tests, duration of resistance tests, mouth rinse dosage, resistance intensity, and training status of participants, may explain the disparity in performance and data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, divergent results in resistance exercise responses to CMR are likely to be associated with intensity of the muscular endurance tests. All [19,20,25,26] but one [27] of the studies that examined the influence of CMR at 40% of 1 RM did not detect any benefit from CMR. Similarly, studies using an intensity of 60% [21,28] and 70% [17,18] of 1 RM did not report any benefit of CMR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Bench press 1 RM was determined in the first familiarization trial using standard procedures [20,25,29]. Briefly, participants conducted a progressive warm-up with a self-…”
Section: One Repetition Maximum Bench Press Strength (1 Rm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps, the CHO mouth rinse duration has been one of the first methodological aspects highlighted as a confounding factor in the literature. However, only a few studies 26 , 46 , 78 , 79 have attempted to verify the influence of longer mouth rinses with CHO solution on exercise performance.…”
Section: Mouth Rinse Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%