2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0813-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of carotid endarterectomy on motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Abstract: In the absence of other MEP changes, our finding of prolonged SPD post-operatively suggests preferential influence of the inhibitory cortical circuits. The potential favorable effect of CEA in patients with hyperexcitability such as disabling spasticity after stroke should be further studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12] However, only a limited number of studies have investigated the validity of the MEP as a monitoring modality during CEA. 12,29 Uchino et al reported that the MEP amplitude significantly decreased in 4 of the 20 Japanese patients (20%) during carotid clamping, which is similar to the results of 2 of 10 patients (20%) in our study. 12 When a shunt tube was selectively used in CEA, 14 of 67 Korean patients ($ 20%) required shunting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[10][11][12] However, only a limited number of studies have investigated the validity of the MEP as a monitoring modality during CEA. 12,29 Uchino et al reported that the MEP amplitude significantly decreased in 4 of the 20 Japanese patients (20%) during carotid clamping, which is similar to the results of 2 of 10 patients (20%) in our study. 12 When a shunt tube was selectively used in CEA, 14 of 67 Korean patients ($ 20%) required shunting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…More sensitive and focused measures have also been used to monitor motor physiology during carotid surgeries, for example transcranial electrical motor evoked potential stimulation in approximately 600 CEA patients, or somatosensory evoked potentials ( Malcharek et al, 2013 ; Uchino et al, 2012 ). Our findings support the validity of studies of motor cortex TMS excitability in patients at risk for vascular cognitive impairment ( Katsoulas et al, 2005 ; Lanza et al, 2017 ) and/or vascular depression ( Bella et al, 2011 ; Concerto et al, 2013 ; Pennisi et al, 2016 ). Whereas TMS motor cortex excitability alone cannot clearly distinguish vascular from other forms of degenerative burden such as Alzheimer's disease ( Pennisi et al, 2015 ), a logical follow-up study would be of changes in motor cortex excitability following lesions in motor cortex occurring during endovascular procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Previously, Katsoulas et al reported the usefulness of MEP elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation before and after CEA. However, this is the first report that validates the usefulness of transcranial MEP monitoring during CEA (14). As the results show, MEP monitoring was available in all but 1 patient who had moderate motor deficits (case 11).…”
Section: Mep Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 58%