2006
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.200600034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cellulose Whiskers on Properties of Soy Protein Thermoplastics

Abstract: Environmentally-friendly SPI/cellulose whisker composites were successfully prepared using a colloidal suspension of cellulose whiskers, to reinforce soy protein isolate (SPI) plastics. The cellulose whiskers, having an average length of 1.2 microm and diameter of 90 nm, respectively, were prepared from cotton linter pulp by hydrolyzing with sulfuric acid aqueous solution. The effects of the whisker content on the morphology and properties of the glycerol-plasticized SPI composites were investigated by scannin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
113
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
113
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration of coconut nanocellulose directly influenced the permeability to water vapor; as the concentration of these nanoparticles increased in nano-biocomposites, the permeability to water vapor decreased (R 2 = 0.98) ( Figure 2). Similar results to this study were found by Lu et al (2005), Wang et al (2006) and Cao et al (2008) for nano-biocomposites with starch, protein and starch matrixes, respectively, containing nanocellulose from cotton linter (Lu et al, 2006) and from hemp (Cao et al, 2008).…”
Section: Barrier Properties Of Nano-biocompositessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The concentration of coconut nanocellulose directly influenced the permeability to water vapor; as the concentration of these nanoparticles increased in nano-biocomposites, the permeability to water vapor decreased (R 2 = 0.98) ( Figure 2). Similar results to this study were found by Lu et al (2005), Wang et al (2006) and Cao et al (2008) for nano-biocomposites with starch, protein and starch matrixes, respectively, containing nanocellulose from cotton linter (Lu et al, 2006) and from hemp (Cao et al, 2008).…”
Section: Barrier Properties Of Nano-biocompositessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Portanto, as duas formulações resultam em filmes que podem ser empregados para diferentes aplicações, independente do aditivo incorporado, já que diferem em relação ao módulo, tensão e deformação. Ressalta-se ainda que as ótimas propriedades mecânicas apresentadas pelos filmes (A, B, CA e CB) estão relacionadas à presença dos nanocristais de celulose de coco, como relatado por outros autores que também incorporaram nanocristais de celulose de diferentes fontes em matrizes poliméricas biodegradáveis (WANG et al, 2006;CAO et al, 2008). SOUZA et al (2012) relatam valores bastante inferiores para a tensão (1,85 a 4,81MPa) de filmes de amido sem a presença de nanocristais de celulose.…”
Section: -----------------------------------------Pt/dia (% Periódicounclassified
“…Both natural and synthetic polymers were explored as the matrixes. Natural polymers such as poly(β-hydroxyoctanoate) (PHO) [19], soy protein [20], silk fibroin [21] reinforced with cellulose whiskers were reported. Meanwhile, Poly-(styrene-co-butyl acrylate) (poly(S-co-BuA)) [22], poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) [23], polypropylene [24], waterborne polyurethane [25], were also used as synthetic matrixes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%