The action of some centrally active compounds on transmission of single impulses through the isolated superior cervical ganglion of the rabbit has been reported by Elliott & Quilliam (1964). Since the sympathetic nerve fibres may transmit 6 to 8 impulses/sec (Folkow, 1952) and investigations of the action of compounds on transmission through the superior cervical ganglion using the nictitating membrane method (Brown & Quilliam, 1964) rely on repetitive stimulation of the preganglionic trunk, the action of centrally active drugs on the repetitively stimulated ganglion is of special interest.
METHODSThe method of recording action potentials from the rabbit isolated superior cervical ganglion preparation and the drugs used were those described by Elliott (1963) and Elliott & Quilliam (1964). Ganglionic potentials, elicited by repetitive supramaximal stimulation of the preganglionic trunk, were recorded with one electrode placed on the ganglion and the other on the postganglionic trunk (Fig. 1). Recordings were made in a moist chamber which could be flooded with Krebs solution equilibrated with 95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide between recording periods. Drugs were added to the chamber fluid and allowed to act for 10 min.A stimulator control apparatus (Bell, 1962) delivered trains of stimuli at a selected frequency. The duration of the train of stimuli was usually 3 sec. A switch, operated by the shutter release mechanism of the oscilloscope camera, triggered the oscilloscope sweep and, after a suitable delay, triggered the train of impulses. The frequency of stimulation lay between 1.4 and 61 shocks/sec.For most of the experiments, the ganglion was stimulated by 3-sec trains of stimuli at 30-sec intervals in ascending order of frequency at the following rates: 3.3, 9.2, 16.5, 28 and 36 shocks/sec. Under the experimental conditions described, posttetanic potentiation following single stimuli may last up to 3 min and probably lasts considerably longer after a train of stimuli. A 30-sec interval between trains of stimuli was chosen as a compromise to avoid the necessity for re-immersion in the drug solution between trains of stimuli and yet not to leave the preparation out of the bath fluid for the long period which would elapse if time were allowed for full recovery of the ganglion after each train of stimuli before applying the next train.As posttetanic potentiation lasted for more than 30 sec in the isolated ganglion, the first two or three stimuli in a train elicited larger responses than the initial response in the preceding train due to potentiation carried over from the preceding train of stimuli. For example, the 16.5-shocks/sec train of impulses potentiated the first few action potentials in the subsequent 28-shocks/sec train even though this train was 30 sec