2015
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00176.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of changing skin mechanics on the differential sensitivity to surface compliance by tactile afferents in the human finger pad

Abstract: It is not known how changes in skin mechanics affect the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the finger pads to compression forces. We used venous occlusion to change the stiffness of the fingers and investigated whether this influenced the firing of low-threshold mechanoreceptors to surfaces of differing stiffness. Unitary recordings were made from 10 slowly adapting type I (SAI), 10 fast adapting type I (FAI) and 9 slowly adapting type II (SAII) units via tungsten microelectrodes inserted into the med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finger pad is a particularly interesting region of glabrous skin because of its role in touch and grip, which critically depend on normal and tangential mechanical interactions [1]. In touch, for example, the tactile perception of softness is partly determined by the compressive deformation of the finger pad, because the resulting subsurface strain fields affect how slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors respond [2][3][4]. While in grip, for example, skin hydration governs the contact area that develops during compressive and tangential loading and this affects both the static friction forces [5] and the dynamics of how slippage occurs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finger pad is a particularly interesting region of glabrous skin because of its role in touch and grip, which critically depend on normal and tangential mechanical interactions [1]. In touch, for example, the tactile perception of softness is partly determined by the compressive deformation of the finger pad, because the resulting subsurface strain fields affect how slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors respond [2][3][4]. While in grip, for example, skin hydration governs the contact area that develops during compressive and tangential loading and this affects both the static friction forces [5] and the dynamics of how slippage occurs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have confirmed the relationship between stimulus application and the impulse rate of SA-I and RA-I mechanoreceptors, as shown in Figure 1(a) and (c). [25][26][27] Considering this observation, it can be assumed that increases in the intensity of the stimulus will influence the number of impulses. Hence, the computational results were more strongly correlated with previous neurophysiological findings 11 under the assumption that the temporal history of von Mises stress represents the number of impulses than under the assumption that it represents the impulse rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we implemented and evaluated a model emulating fast adapting mechanoreceptors (RA1) to investigate its stiffness encoding capacity during the loading phase with constant velocity. RA1 receptors are responsive to encode the interaction with the skin during the dynamic phases of the grasp, unlike SA1 units that are more sensitive not only during the loading phase, but also during the static holding phase [27]. Two FBGs (FBG1 and FBG2 in Figure 1), each one integrated in optical fibers along the longitudinal axis of the finger, were chosen to mimic these receptors through neuromorphic processing.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%