1958
DOI: 10.1104/pp.33.2.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Chloride and Sulfate Ions on the Growth, Leaf Burn, Composition and Anatomical Structure of Tobacco (Nicotiana Tabacum L.).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High leaf chloride reduces burn rate (Wedin and Struckmeyer, 1958) and degrades the aroma, odor and taste (Kitamura et al, 1978). However, 'Basma' tobacco types grown in Iran accumulate less chloride and can thus be grown under saline conditions (Morard et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…High leaf chloride reduces burn rate (Wedin and Struckmeyer, 1958) and degrades the aroma, odor and taste (Kitamura et al, 1978). However, 'Basma' tobacco types grown in Iran accumulate less chloride and can thus be grown under saline conditions (Morard et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tobacco is known to accumulate Cl and values of up to 10% have been recorded for leaves of plants grown under greenhouse conditions (McCants and Woltz, 1967). Chloride is considered detrimental to tobacco quality through reducing burn rate (Wedin and Struckmeyer, 1958) and degrading the aroma, odor, and taste (Kitamura et al, 1978). A Cl concentration of 3% is considered to be the maximum permissible level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the UCPRS‐17, there was no interaction between the sampling times and the Cl rates applied, but in the average of all the sampling periods evaluated, the S content in the leaf decreased with the Cl rates. Wedin and Struckmeyer (1958) also found that S uptake was depressed by an increase in Cl in tobacco leaves. However, in all cases evaluated in our study, the leaf S concentration was never below the optimal range (0.15%–0.60%, Table 3) (Figures 3e and 6), indicating that S was not a limiting nutrient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%