2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40261-018-0711-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cilostazol-Based Triple Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cilostazol is widely used in patients with coronary artery disease after receiving PCI to reduce the risk of thrombotic events. The beneficial effects of cilostazol appear to extend beyond its obvious antiplatelet effects, and have been attributed to its reduction of in-stent and in-segment restenosis [28][29][30], protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury [31] and improvement of endothelial function [32,33]. A recent research suggested that cilostazol could inhibit apoptosis in some circumstances to protect cell viability [34] indicating that cilostazol might protect endothelia in a similar way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cilostazol is widely used in patients with coronary artery disease after receiving PCI to reduce the risk of thrombotic events. The beneficial effects of cilostazol appear to extend beyond its obvious antiplatelet effects, and have been attributed to its reduction of in-stent and in-segment restenosis [28][29][30], protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury [31] and improvement of endothelial function [32,33]. A recent research suggested that cilostazol could inhibit apoptosis in some circumstances to protect cell viability [34] indicating that cilostazol might protect endothelia in a similar way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a more recent metaanalysis indicated that triple therapy had a significant benefit on in-stent restenosis (RR, 0.645; P = .007), and revascularization (RR, 0.52-0.57; P < .0001). 12 However, triple therapy caused more headache, rash, and GI disorders. Similar results were reported for the second-generation drug-eluting stent subgroup, except for all-cause mortality (RR, 2.161; P = .048) and liver dysfunction (RR, 0.176; P = .049).…”
Section: Meta-analyses On Triple Therapy Meta-analyses Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulated experience indicates that it is a useful, albeit underutilized, agent for both coronary (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD), particularly for patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization; it also has similar or greater efficacy and safety profiles vs conventional antiplatelet agents for secondary prevention of stroke, while it constitutes an alternative in those who are allergic or intolerant to classical antithrombotic agents, such as aspirin or clopidogrel 9–14 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another effective therapeutic regimen is the triple antiplatelet regimen with phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, namely cilostazol, the efficiency of which has been shown in the improvement of angiographic results after DES implantation in recent years [ 43 - 46 ]. Although this regimen is still controversial, the ability of cilostazol to increase cAMP (that inhibits VSMCs growth) along with the upregulation of p53 and p21 factors increasing apoptosis in VSMCs as well as the capacity of this drug to accelerate endothelial regeneration is likely to account for higher efficacy of the regimen [ 47 ]. Inhibitors of P2Y12 platelet receptor (including clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) are also used to treat patients with ISR.…”
Section: The Anti-platelet Approach Toward Isr: a Promising Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%