1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(97)00086-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of citrus by-product supplementation on the intake and digestibility of urea+sodium hydroxide-treated barley straw in goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Crude protein showed a small decrease when the NaOH treatment was applied. This observed decrease was consistent with previous studies and was a disadvantage of this treatment when compared with others, such as treatment with ammonia or urea, which are sources of non-protein nitrogen (Madrid et al, 1998). The decrease in NDF was most evident with the 8% concentration of NaOH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Crude protein showed a small decrease when the NaOH treatment was applied. This observed decrease was consistent with previous studies and was a disadvantage of this treatment when compared with others, such as treatment with ammonia or urea, which are sources of non-protein nitrogen (Madrid et al, 1998). The decrease in NDF was most evident with the 8% concentration of NaOH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Observa-se que somente o teor de PB não sofreu influência (p>0,05) do tratamento com NaOH, fato já esperado, tendo em vista que a ação do NaOH sobre a deslignificação da hemicelulose e da celulose da parede celular não deve alterar a concentração de PB (concentração de nitrogênio multiplicado por 6,25), diferenciando-se dos tratamentos que utilizam produtos químicos, como a amônia ou a uréia, que incorporam nitrogênio não protéico ao material tratado (Madrid et al, 1998). Qualquer alteração nos teores de PB de feno tratado exclusivamente com NaOH, possivelmente, estaria associada à leve fermentação durante o tratamento (Chaudhry, 1998).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…There are reports on the increase in the intake of roughages treated with urea when supplemented with concentrates. Schiere and de Wit (1995), Madrid et al (1998), andSingh et al (2007) report an increase in treated straw intake when supplemented with energetic or protein by-products. Sanh et al (2002) found no differences in DM intake of crossbred dairy cows when urea treated rice straw substituted up to 75% of green tropical grass; although high levels of concentrate supplements may reduce the intake of treated roughages due to substitution and negative associative effects (Schiere and de Wit 1995).…”
Section: Intake Of Maize Strawmentioning
confidence: 99%