2013
DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2013.852910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of co-branding on consumers' purchase intention and evaluation of apparel attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…aesthetics and functionality) indirectly affected repurchase intention of such product. Also, Wu and Chalip (2014) conclude that apparel attributes dimensions of practical good looks, value for quality and comfortable fit are significant predictors of purchase intention. Another survey study from Park et al (2012) found direct effects of sensory attributes of apparel products and variety of selection on eimpulse buying and suggests that an extensive variety of items encourages consumers to look for clothes with hedonic purposes such as pleasure and diversion.…”
Section: Perceived Lack Of Style and Unfashionable Optionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…aesthetics and functionality) indirectly affected repurchase intention of such product. Also, Wu and Chalip (2014) conclude that apparel attributes dimensions of practical good looks, value for quality and comfortable fit are significant predictors of purchase intention. Another survey study from Park et al (2012) found direct effects of sensory attributes of apparel products and variety of selection on eimpulse buying and suggests that an extensive variety of items encourages consumers to look for clothes with hedonic purposes such as pleasure and diversion.…”
Section: Perceived Lack Of Style and Unfashionable Optionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…When talking about fashion, customers pay a good attention to product attributes such as style, fit and quality (Niinimäki, 2010;Rayman et al, 2011) which significantly influence their purchase decision (Ko et al, 2011;Wu and Chalip, 2014). Clothing is a symbol of selfexpression, with social meanings, aesthetic considerations and hedonic benefits (Easey, 2009;Lambert, 2019;Lundblad and Davies, 2016;Niinimäki, 2010).…”
Section: Perceived Lack Of Style and Unfashionable Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-congruity refers to the match between consumers' self-image and their image of a given product, brand, store, etc. Self-congruity influences several aspects of consumer buying behavior, such as perceived quality (Kwak, & Kang, 2009) and purchase intention (Wu & Chalip, 2014;Sirgy et al, 1997). Perceived quality is a subjective overall evaluation of a product or a service from the consumers' perspective and is influenced by factors such as brand familiarity (Quintal & Phau, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diantaranya dengan mengetahui brand awareness (Washburn, 2000), brand image (Kottemann et. at., 2017), brand attitude (Mazodier & Maronka, 2014), purchase intention (Wu & Chalip, 2013) serta kekuatan elemen pembentuk co-branding (Keller, 2013). Kelima alternatif tersebut dapat digunakan untuk mengukur keefektifan cobranding, sehingga perlu juga dilakukan secara holistik agar secara utuh dapat menjawab posisi persepsi co-branding di mata wisatawan.…”
Section: Metodeunclassified