1990
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
175
0
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
175
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose this coil because it produces a magnetic-field maximum of sufficiently small width to allow stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex without encroaching on the primary motor cortex. A similar coil was previously found to stimulate an estimated volume of 20 ϫ 20 ϫ 10 mm (Cohen et al, 1990;Maccabee et al, 1990;Wassermann et al, 1996). Subjects used a bite bar during stimulation while a mechanical arm held the coil over the target locations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this coil because it produces a magnetic-field maximum of sufficiently small width to allow stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex without encroaching on the primary motor cortex. A similar coil was previously found to stimulate an estimated volume of 20 ϫ 20 ϫ 10 mm (Cohen et al, 1990;Maccabee et al, 1990;Wassermann et al, 1996). Subjects used a bite bar during stimulation while a mechanical arm held the coil over the target locations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a ®gure-ofeight coil, each winding measuring 7 cm (maximum output 2 T) producing the maximum electric ®eld below its center and so the zone of stimulation is more focal [20]. The center of the coil was positioned over the cortical site to be stimulated (left parietal, right parietal or right frontal) in a parasagittal line with the handle pointing posteriorly.…”
Section: Tms: the Equipment Consisted Of A Magstim Model 200mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, careful construction is essential. Stimulating coils are available in a variety of shapes and sizes (Cohen et al 1990). Larger circular coils use more copper mass, thus having lower electrical resistance and higher heat capacity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four-leaf magnetic coils (Roth et al 1994) and other, more complicated geometries and newer construction materials might in the future provide more focal stimulation coils. In the case of a circular coil the induced tissue current is maximal under the mean diameter and is near zero in the centre of the coil (¢gure 2) (Cohen et al 1990;Maccabee et al 1990;Tofts 1990;Roth et al 1991). In the case of the ¢gure-of-eight coil practically only neural structures under its centre (at the intersection of the two wings of the coil) are stimulated (¢gure 2) (Cohen et al 1990;Maccabee et al 1990;Tofts 1990;Roth et al 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%