2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of combustion heat release on velocity and scalar statistics in turbulent premixed jet flames at low and high Karlovitz numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, some of the findings outlined here, such as the variations of the kinetic-energy spectra across the flame or the prevailing drainage of SFS kinetic energy by multi-scale energy-transfer mechanisms related to the convective and pressure-gradient transfer terms, are qualitatively ratified by earlier work on a similar configuration using physical-space and Fourier filters (Towery et al 2016;O'Brien et al 2017), even though the exact equivalences between these different approaches are not straightforward to quantify. Aspects worthy of future work to clarify some of these open research questions may include (a) the consideration of wider parameter ranges in the combustion-regime diagram which may enable comparisons and elucidation of more general physical trends in flame energetics, (b) the partition of the physical-space flow field into solenoidal and irrotational components to wavelet-analyse each contribution and isolate the role of thermal expansion in the energy transfer, (c) the incorporation of complex chemical effects that are known to be important for the propagation of realistic turbulent flames and (d) the utilization of different and perhaps more practical flow configurations for turbulent combustion, including effects related to externally applied pressure gradients (Veynante & Poinsot 1997), shear layers (Wang et al 2017;MacArt, Grenga & Mueller 2018) and high-speed compressibility phenomena (Urzay 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, some of the findings outlined here, such as the variations of the kinetic-energy spectra across the flame or the prevailing drainage of SFS kinetic energy by multi-scale energy-transfer mechanisms related to the convective and pressure-gradient transfer terms, are qualitatively ratified by earlier work on a similar configuration using physical-space and Fourier filters (Towery et al 2016;O'Brien et al 2017), even though the exact equivalences between these different approaches are not straightforward to quantify. Aspects worthy of future work to clarify some of these open research questions may include (a) the consideration of wider parameter ranges in the combustion-regime diagram which may enable comparisons and elucidation of more general physical trends in flame energetics, (b) the partition of the physical-space flow field into solenoidal and irrotational components to wavelet-analyse each contribution and isolate the role of thermal expansion in the energy transfer, (c) the incorporation of complex chemical effects that are known to be important for the propagation of realistic turbulent flames and (d) the utilization of different and perhaps more practical flow configurations for turbulent combustion, including effects related to externally applied pressure gradients (Veynante & Poinsot 1997), shear layers (Wang et al 2017;MacArt, Grenga & Mueller 2018) and high-speed compressibility phenomena (Urzay 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same physical explanations which were mentioned earlier in the context of RANS to explain the greater extent of isotropy for T ij and ε ij for the cases with high turbulence intensities are also qualitatively valid in the context of subgrid quantities. The modification of anisotropy distribution in the Lumley triangle in turbulent premixed flames in comparison to that in the corresponding non-reacting flow has been reported in [15], and these findings have, in the meantime, been confirmed independently by a few other DNS groups [37][38][39]: Turbulent premixed flames cause strong anisotropies such that the turbulent state is located on the axisymmetric expansion border and reaches, depending on the turbulence intensity (Karlovitz number), from the isotropic state twothirds up the way to the one component endpoint. Furthermore, early measurements of the enhancement of turbulence anisotropy in large-scale, low-intensity turbulent premixed propane-air flames using two-component measurements have been reported by Furukuwa et al [40].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A similar criterion of importance of thermal expansion effects in premixed turbulent flames was proposed earlier by Bilger, 72 but based on a different reasoning. Recent DNS data by MacArt et al 73,74 are also consistent with such a criterion, while dilatational and solenoidal dissipations are not compared in the cited papers.…”
Section: B a Simple Criterion To Estimate Importance Of Dilatational Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 90%