Effects of complex-descending versus traditional resistance training on physical fitness abilities of female team sports athletes

This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of untested single- and dual-beam timing gates and compare them with previously validated video-based applications to measure linear and change of direction sprint (CODS) times. Twenty-three participants were concurrently assessed for 30 m linear sprint and CODS time using single- and dual-beam timing gates and the MySprint and COD Timer applications. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation, independent t-test and Bland-Altman plots were used for comparison between instruments. ICC, Cronbach’s alpha and coefficient of variation (CV) analyses were used to assess the test-retest reliability. Excellent ICC was noted for test-retest reliability (0.982–0.984 [sprint], 0.940–0.942 [CODS]), with a high Cronbach’s alpha (all 0.997 [sprints], 0.988–0.989 [CODS]) and acceptable CV (1.296–1.946%) for all the timing systems. Similarly, excellent ICC (0.989–0.994 [sprint], 0.998–0.999 [CODS]) and very high correlation ( r = 0.990–0.994 [sprints] and r = 0.998–1.000 [CODS]) were reported between the single- and dual-beam timing gates, and the MySprint and COD Timer applications, with non-significant differences between the measurements ( p = 0.754–0.960). However, the Bland-Altman plots represented that values measured with the three instruments were inconsistent with most values away from the mean of the difference between instruments. In conclusion, both photocell timing systems are reliable instruments for measuring linear sprint time and CODS time. However, the timing systems should not be used interchangeably to interpret findings. Furthermore, it is suggested that similar timing systems with an identical setup should be used for the measurement of timings for interpretations.

show abstract

What do we Know about Complex-Contrast Training? A Systematic Scoping Review

Thapa,

Weldon,

Freitas

et al. 2024

Sports Med - Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The complex-contrast training (CCT) method utilizes two exercises with different loads and movement velocities in a set-by-set fashion to induce multiple neuromuscular adaptations. The speculated primary mechanism involves the post-activation potentiation or post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) of the muscles used during the heavy load (low velocity) exercise, thereby improving the performance of lower load (high velocity) exercise. However, no previous study has attempted to systematically synthesize the available evidence on CCT (e.g., if post-activation potentiation or PAPE was measured during the training sessions during the intervention period). This study aimed to synthesize the available evidence on CCT using a systematic scoping review approach. More specifically, we identified gaps in the literature using an evidence gap map (EGM), and provided future directions for research. Methods Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched up to 20th February 2024. Data were extracted under a PICO framework: (a) Participants-related data (e.g., age, sex, type of sport); (b) Intervention-related data (e.g., duration of training); (c) Comparators (when available); and (d) Outcomes (e.g., measures of physical fitness). Interactive EGMs were created using the EPPI mapper software. Results From the 5,695 records screened, 68 studies were eligible for inclusion, involving 1,821 participants (only 145 females from 5 studies). All CCT interventions lasted ≤ 16 weeks. More than half of the studies assessed countermovement jump, sprint, and maximal strength performances. No studies were identified which examined upper-body CCT exercises alone, and no study assessed PAPE during the CCT sessions. Overall, the available evidence was rated with a low level of confidence. Conclusions In conclusion, whether CCT produces a PAPE that translates into longitudinal performance gains remains unclear. Moreover, the available evidence on the effects of CCT on various outcomes provides low confidence regarding the most effective way to implement this training method, particularly among females, and beyond long-term interventions.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Effects of complex-descending versus traditional resistance training on physical fitness abilities of female team sports athletes

Cited by 5 publications

References 52 publications

Effects of complex training compared to resistance training alone on physical fitness of healthy individuals: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Effects of complex training compared to resistance training alone on physical fitness of healthy individuals: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Test-retest reliability and comparison of single- and dual-beam photocell timing system with video-based applications to measure linear and change of direction sprint times

What do we Know about Complex-Contrast Training? A Systematic Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About