Lectins and various other proteins that bind to cell surface molecules can induce blast transformation in normal lymphocytes and have therefore been used extensively as tools in investigating both antigenic stimulation of lymphocytes and growth control of eukaryotic cells. Although the analysis of lymphocyte stimulation would ideally be carried out using antigens as mitogens, it is presently more feasible to study the detailed kinetics and biochemistry of the commitment to growth using lectins. A typical mitogenic lectin, concanavalin A (Con A), 1 is a tetravalent molecule of known structure and binding specificity (1). Its dose-response curve shows an optimal concentration for stimulating mitogenesis of T lymphocytes; the eventual response as measured by increased DNA synthesis diminishes sharply with lectin concentrations higher than this optimum. We have previously analyzed this unimodal dose-response curve (2) using low molecular weight probes such as phorbol esters, and chemically altered lectins such as succinylated Con A (3), a divalent derivative that shows no inhibitory effects at high doses. It was shown that the stimulatory and inhibitory portions of such a dose-response curve can be dissected and independently modified.The present study indicates that the action of Con A is paradoxical in higher dose ranges, i.e. it both stimulates and inhibits, a finding in accord with previous evidence (4). Because the relative contributions of these paradoxical effects and their biochemical bases have not been thoroughly explored, we have carried out an extensive analysis of the kinetics of cell commitment, DNA synthesis, and cell interactions. In this paper, we provide evidence that: (a) the stimulatory signal is proportional to the concentration of lectin, even in the inhibitory dose range; (b) the inhibitory signal can be given beth to normal lymphocytes and continuously proliferating lymphoid cells (2, 5-8); (c) the inhibition is reversible; and (d) the inhibition is not a function of direct cellular interactions as shown by analyzing cultures of cells suspended in agarose. The paradoxical inhibitory phase that occurs despite the stimulation at high doses can be understood in terms of the previously described behavior of surface modulating assemblies (SMA) in lymphoid cells (9-11).