2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05199-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of conditioned social fear on ethanol drinking and vice-versa in male mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SFC was performed with a computerised fear conditioning system (TSE System GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) as previously described (Kornhuber et al, 2019; Toth et al, 2012; Zoicas et al, 2014, 2016; see Toth and Neumann, 2013 for a schematic representation of the SFC paradigm). Mice were placed in the conditioning chamber (45 cm×22 cm×40 cm), and after a 30-second habituation period, an empty wire mesh cage (7 cm×7 cm×6 cm) was placed as a non-social stimulus near one of the short walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SFC was performed with a computerised fear conditioning system (TSE System GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) as previously described (Kornhuber et al, 2019; Toth et al, 2012; Zoicas et al, 2014, 2016; see Toth and Neumann, 2013 for a schematic representation of the SFC paradigm). Mice were placed in the conditioning chamber (45 cm×22 cm×40 cm), and after a 30-second habituation period, an empty wire mesh cage (7 cm×7 cm×6 cm) was placed as a non-social stimulus near one of the short walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, all control SFC + mice (i.e., water-drinking and vehicle-treated) used in this study failed to show extinction of social fear, i.e., a gradual decrease in social fear as a result of repeated exposure to social stimuli. Gradual social fear extinction has been previously described in untreated and vehicle-treated CD1 mice [22,23,[34][35][36][37][38][39] and is similar to the outcome during exposure therapy in SAD patients [2]. This difference in social fear extinction might arise from potential genetic-related strain differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These strain differences in social behavior were not only observed in SFC + mice but, also, in SFC − mice, i.e., SFC − ASM+/+, ASM+/−, and ASM−/− mice showed lower levels of social investigation during social fear extinction compared with SFC − CD1 mice. SFC − CD1 mice usually spend around 80% of the time investigating the social stimuli [22,23,[34][35][36][37][38][39] and show high levels of aggressive behavior, whereas SFC − C57BL/6 mice used in this study spent around 60% of the time investigating the social stimuli and showed no aggressive behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SFC. SFC was performed with a computerized fear conditioning system (TSE System GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) as previously described [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Mice were placed in the conditioning chamber (45 × 22 × 40 cm) and, after a 30-s habituation period, an empty wire mesh cage (7 × 7 × 6 cm) was placed as a non-social stimulus near one of the short walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%