1992
DOI: 10.3109/00206099209072897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Contralateral White Noise on Click-Evoked Emissions in Normal and Sensorineural Ears: Towards an Exploration of the Medial Olivocochlear System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
65
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively steeper off-frequency TMCs in the low threshold group are consistent with a fully functional MOC reflex. In contrast, this reflex may be partially dysfunctional in listeners with hearing impairment due to OHC damage (Collet et al 1992) and result in a relatively shallower off-frequency TMC. Previous studies have simulated the MOC reflex using the Zilany et al (Smalt et al 2014).…”
Section: Sensitivity To F Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively steeper off-frequency TMCs in the low threshold group are consistent with a fully functional MOC reflex. In contrast, this reflex may be partially dysfunctional in listeners with hearing impairment due to OHC damage (Collet et al 1992) and result in a relatively shallower off-frequency TMC. Previous studies have simulated the MOC reflex using the Zilany et al (Smalt et al 2014).…”
Section: Sensitivity To F Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators have turned their attention to the study of the effects of contralateral stimuli on various parameters of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans and in £uiimals and have demonstrated that stimulation of the ear opposite the one receiving the evoking stimulus reduces the amplitude of the otoacoustic emission (Berlin, Hood, Cecola, Jackson, & Szabo, 1993a;Berlin et al, 1994;Berlin et al, 1993b;Collet et al, 1990;Collet et al, 1992;Harrison & Bums, 1993;Kujawa, Glattke, Fallon, & Bobbin, 1992;Puel & Rebillard, 1990;Ryan, Kemp, & Hinchcliffe, 1991;Veuillet, Collet, & Duclaux, 1991). This effect is believed to be mediated by the MOC system (Berlin et al, 1994;Collet, 1993;Collet et al, 1990;Giraud, Collet, Chery-Croze, Magnan, & Chays, 1995), and suggests that the contralateral suppression of auditory nerve responses described previously may result from activity at the cochlear level.…”
Section: Suppression Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suppression effect on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans is a small but consistent decrease of 1-4 dB in overall emission amplitude in the presence of a contralateral acoustic stimulus (Berlin et al, 1993b(Berlin et al, , 1994Collet et al, 1990Collet et al, , 1992Ryan et al, 1991Ryan et al, , 1996Veuillet et al, 1991;Veuillet, Duverdy-Bertholon, & Collet, 1996). Collet is credited as the first person to describe contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans (Berlin et al, 1993b;Collet et al, 1990).…”
Section: Suppression Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efferent pathways were identified and studied by numerous authors 3,4,5,6,12,13 , and contralateral inhibitions suppression was initially studied by Collet 8 and later confirmed by many others 10,14,15 . In 1999, Pialarassi 10 studied the suppression of transient and distortion product otoacoustic emissions with contralateral stimulus by a narrow band noise in 48 individuals with normal hearing and 9 individuals with retrocochlear disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%