2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of core excess reactivity and coolant average temperature on maximum operable time of NIRR-1 miniature neutron source reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control rod position shows a gradual rise with time. This is an in-build future to compensate for high negative temperature coefficient of reactivity in order to keep the reactor at the preset power level [7]. This result is in agreement with the safety requirement of the reactor, which does not permit power excursion and occurrence of boiling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The control rod position shows a gradual rise with time. This is an in-build future to compensate for high negative temperature coefficient of reactivity in order to keep the reactor at the preset power level [7]. This result is in agreement with the safety requirement of the reactor, which does not permit power excursion and occurrence of boiling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…(Tables 1-4) reveals that NIRR-1 could be operated at half power (flux of 5×10^1 1n cm -2 s -1 for about seven to eight continuous hours before the control rod attains it maximum value of 232mm which by implication will trigger the reactor to automatically shut down [1]. This, in combination with the limited MNSR excess reactivity that is less than 0.5$ is another safety feature guaranteed by in-build negative temperature coefficient of reactivity, [7] just in case the reactor is left unattended to for so long [16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations