2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cr(VI) on the performance and kinetics of the activated sludge process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 2S (Cheng et al, 2011). Consequently, in this study, relationships between the NH 4 + -N removal efficiencies and the TTC-ETS activities in the control and the three AAMA + O 3 /US systems were investigated by statistical correlation analysis (Table 3).…”
Section: Effects Of Returned O 3 /Us Pretreated Sludge Lyses On Ttc-ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 2S (Cheng et al, 2011). Consequently, in this study, relationships between the NH 4 + -N removal efficiencies and the TTC-ETS activities in the control and the three AAMA + O 3 /US systems were investigated by statistical correlation analysis (Table 3).…”
Section: Effects Of Returned O 3 /Us Pretreated Sludge Lyses On Ttc-ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that nitrifying bacteria was more sensitive than heterotrophic bacteria to the toxicity of Cr(VI), and a Cr(VI) concentration of 0.5 mg L −1 caused significant inhibition of the nitrification process (up to 74% decrease in ammonia removal efficiency) [9]. Cheng et al [10] found that NH4 + -N removal decreased from 97% to 68% with the addition of Cr(VI) with 5 mg L −1 in an SBR. Fang et al [11] tested the acute tolerance of an enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) system on a high of concentration Cr(VI) and revealed that P removal performance was completely inhibited by Cr(VI) with a concentration higher than 5 mg L −1 , but the EBPR system could recover after a short Cr(VI) shock.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Wastewater Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Fang et al [2] studied the long-term effects (52-d systematic investigation) of a low concentration of Cr(VI) (0.3-0.8 mg L −1 ) on the P removal performance of a granule-based EBPR system, and found that a high Cr(VI) concentration (0.5 mg L −1 ) could significantly inhibit P removal; filamentous bacteria overgrew, and eventually sludge bulking occurred in long-term Cr (VI) loading. The discrepancy in results of Cr(VI) effects on microbial metabolic activities could be attributed both to metal speciation [12] and the types of assays used [10], which played an important role when comparing toxicity expressions by different studies [7]. Nevertheless, most of the above investigations studied the short-term and long-term toxicity of Cr(VI) on EBPR system, data from which cannot shed light on the likelihood of the long-term stable operation of a simple nitrifying activated sludge system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study demonstrated that the substrate removal performance depends on the microbial metabolism in the activated sludge system, and that the ETS activity is an important parameter for the evaluation of the microbial metabolic level [22]. In this study, the TTC-ETS of the aerobic granular sludge increased by 20.2% with the increasing Cr(VI) concentration of up to 5 mg/L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…(2) Specific ammonia utilization rate (sAUR) [22] was determined using the short-term batch reactors. The initial conditions (including the granular sludge and synthetic wastewater) and operational parameters (including pH, dissolved oxygen, and MLSS) of the batch assays were similar to those of the continuous flow reactors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%