2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cross-wise obstacle position on methane–air deflagration characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past few decades, an increasing number of scholars have used experimental and numerical methods to carry out a large number of studies on large-scale confined spaces with built-in congestion gas explosions and explosion venting effects [6]. Moen et al [7] used a 50 m 3 circular pipe to study the effects of the area blocking rate and amount of orifice congestion on the explosion venting of a methane/air mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, an increasing number of scholars have used experimental and numerical methods to carry out a large number of studies on large-scale confined spaces with built-in congestion gas explosions and explosion venting effects [6]. Moen et al [7] used a 50 m 3 circular pipe to study the effects of the area blocking rate and amount of orifice congestion on the explosion venting of a methane/air mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum explosion characteristics (overpressure, turbulence intensity and flame propagation speed) were achieved for triangular profile. Wen et al [22]studied the effect of various cross-wise orientations for three obstacle arrangements in vented chamber on deflagration behavior. For the configuration of three centrally located obstacles, deflagration dynamics expressed in flame speed and overpressure achieved the highest values, in which flame velocity speeds up to 82 m/s, whereas the lowest flame velocity is reported at 42 m/s for the configuration with three obstacles mounted on one side of the chamber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, largescale experiments with built-in solid obstacles are very hard to explore the deflagration mechanism due to the difficulty of conducting detailed measurements [9,10]. Using advantaged test technology of laser diagnostic, some lab-scale experiments [11][12][13][14][15][16] were performed to investigate the mechanism of deflagration in complex geometries and short periods. By performing the deflagration test [13] in a vented chamber with solid obstacles varying in numbers and locations, it was concluded that obstacles had significant impacts on the overpressure effect and flame structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By performing the deflagration test [13] in a vented chamber with solid obstacles varying in numbers and locations, it was concluded that obstacles had significant impacts on the overpressure effect and flame structure. Deflagration experiment on the flame-obstacle interactions was conducted [14] by considering three different obstacle configurations, i.e., side, central, and staggered, respectively. A comprehensive experimental study of natural gas combustion in a stainless steel cylinder vessel (diameter 180 mm and height 210 mm) was conducted by Tang, Zhang et al [17] to investigate the influence of the initial conditions such as equivalence ratios, pressures, and temperatures, as well as monitoring the peak overpressures to provide fundamental data for natural gas engine timing control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%