2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep32844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of density dependence in a temperate forest in northeastern China

Abstract: Negative density dependence may cause reduced clustering among individuals of the same species, and evidence is accumulating that conspecific density-dependent self-thinning is an important mechanism regulating the spatial structure of plant populations. This study evaluates that specific density dependence in three very large observational studies representing three successional stages in a temperate forest in northeastern China. The methods include standard spatial point pattern analysis and a heterogeneous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reduction in seedling performance, productivity, and survival with increasing seedling density as evidenced in the Main Experiment would then at least partly be the result of competitive effects for space and other resources (Yao et al. , Lin et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reduction in seedling performance, productivity, and survival with increasing seedling density as evidenced in the Main Experiment would then at least partly be the result of competitive effects for space and other resources (Yao et al. , Lin et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second scenario, however, might be that density-dependent effects encountered were additionally brought about by intraspecific competition and not necessarily by JC effects only. A reduction in seedling performance, productivity, and survival with increasing seedling density as evidenced in the Main Experiment would then at least partly be the result of competitive effects for space and other resources (Yao et al 2016, Lin et al 2017). In the present study, this interpretation could be particularly valid for seedling performance and productivity, for both of which we found similar effects of significant reduction with increasing density of conspecific recruits in the Main Experiment and in the Common Garden Experiment.…”
Section: Density Dependencementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although such inferences are possible, they are usually weak and require an extra degree of caution relative to inferences from dynamic experimental studies (Damgaard & Weiner 2017a) and appropriate statistical techniques (e.g. Bagchi et al 2011;Yao et al 2016). A major problem is that different processes and different combinations of processes can generate similar spatial patterns, which makes it difficult to distinguish between them (Detto & Muller-Landau 2013;Damgaard & Weiner 2017b;H€ ulsmann & Harting 2018).…”
Section: Static Spatial Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Janzen-Connell hypothesis (Janzen 1970;Connell 1971), for example, proposes that elevated numbers of specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant communities. They reduce the survival rates of conspecific seeds and seedlings located close to reproductive adults or in areas of high conspecific density (Comita et al 2014) leading to elevated conspecific self-thinning (Yao et al 2016), i.e. a progressive decline in density in a population of growing individuals of the same species (Begon et al 2006, p. 157).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a progressive decline in density in a population of growing individuals of the same species (Begon et al 2006, p. 157). An important effect of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis is the negative density/distance dependence that occurs when nearby conspecific plants negatively affect performance through mechanisms such as intraspecific competition and pest facilitation (Wills et al 1997;Wright 2002;Piao et al 2013;Yao et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%