2013
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-6157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary inclusion of pea and faba bean as a replacement for soybean meal on grower and finisher pig performance and carcass quality1

Abstract: To reduce reliance on imported soybean meal (SBM) in temperate environments, pea and faba bean may be alternative protein sources for pig diets. We assessed the effects of dietary pea and faba bean inclusion on grower and finisher pig performance and carcass quality. There were 9 dietary treatments tested on both grower (30 to 60 kg) and finisher (60 to 100 kg) pigs in a dose response feeding trial. The control diet included SBM at 14 and 12% for grower and finisher pigs, respectively, whereas in the test diet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
37
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
11
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences were found for average daily gain (ADG) (Table 2), which was similar for all dietary groups, as confirmed by the achievement of the same slaughter weight of pigs. This result is consistent with other findings, which showed the lack of differences in growth performance of pig fed with diets containing Pisum sativum or Faba bean vs soybean meal, both with a low (Mordenti et al, 2012) or high inclusion rate (Stein et al, 2006;Chrenková et al, 2011;Prandini et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2013) always balanced for essential AA. In contrast, Partenen et al (2003) proposed a limit of 20% of faba bean inclusion in the diet because a higher concentration resulted in a decrease in ADG in the growing period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…No significant differences were found for average daily gain (ADG) (Table 2), which was similar for all dietary groups, as confirmed by the achievement of the same slaughter weight of pigs. This result is consistent with other findings, which showed the lack of differences in growth performance of pig fed with diets containing Pisum sativum or Faba bean vs soybean meal, both with a low (Mordenti et al, 2012) or high inclusion rate (Stein et al, 2006;Chrenková et al, 2011;Prandini et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2013) always balanced for essential AA. In contrast, Partenen et al (2003) proposed a limit of 20% of faba bean inclusion in the diet because a higher concentration resulted in a decrease in ADG in the growing period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In recent years, this problem has been partially overcome by using resources with a low content of tannins (Acciaioli et al, 2003;Crepon et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2013). Moreover, it is known that the use of Pisum sativum and Vicia faba bean in pigs is limited due to their partial deficiency in indispensable AA, such as methionine (Met) and tryptophan (Try) (Smith et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When faba beans are prepared for cattle feeding, small-seed varieties with low-tannin, low vicineconvicine and low-trypsin restraint contents are preferred (McVicar et al, 2013). Faba bean is an alternative to soybeans as a source of protein in cattle feed in Europe (Blair, 2007;Jezierny et al, 2010 andSmith et al, 2013). We can used Faba bean plants to make delicious silage (McVicar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%