1991
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4488(91)90031-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary supplement of rumen undegradable protein upon carcass composition of fat-tail Awassi sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cottonseed meal (CSM) and sorghum grain (SG) are common feed ingredients used in livestock diets that can also be replaced by DDGS in small ruminant production systems, notably for fattening lambs ( Whitney and Braden, 2010 ; Hodges et al, 2020a ). Furthermore, DDGS contains high levels of rumen undegradable protein (RUP; 45% of total protein; Belyea et al, 2010 ) and sulfur (S, 0.11%-0.84%; Liu, 2011 ), which can enhance growth and wool production ( Hassan et al, 1991 ; Castro-Pérez et al, 2014 ), and fiber that help reduce acidosis problems ( Klopfenstein, 1996 ). Maximizing the inclusion rate of DDGS in small ruminant diets without negatively affecting growth, health, or end products will benefit not only corn growers and the ethanol industry but also the sheep industry by potentially reducing feed costs ( Felix et al, 2012 ; Hodges et al, 2020b ; Quadros et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cottonseed meal (CSM) and sorghum grain (SG) are common feed ingredients used in livestock diets that can also be replaced by DDGS in small ruminant production systems, notably for fattening lambs ( Whitney and Braden, 2010 ; Hodges et al, 2020a ). Furthermore, DDGS contains high levels of rumen undegradable protein (RUP; 45% of total protein; Belyea et al, 2010 ) and sulfur (S, 0.11%-0.84%; Liu, 2011 ), which can enhance growth and wool production ( Hassan et al, 1991 ; Castro-Pérez et al, 2014 ), and fiber that help reduce acidosis problems ( Klopfenstein, 1996 ). Maximizing the inclusion rate of DDGS in small ruminant diets without negatively affecting growth, health, or end products will benefit not only corn growers and the ethanol industry but also the sheep industry by potentially reducing feed costs ( Felix et al, 2012 ; Hodges et al, 2020b ; Quadros et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there were no significant differences among all carcass linear dimensions, carcass cut weights and dissected loin tissue weights at the same carcass weight for both treatments (protein source and formaldehyde treatment). Hassan et al (1991) investigated the response to supplementation with rumen undegradable nitrogen (RUN) given with diets of either 70:30 or 30:70 roughage:concentrate ratio, upon carcass composition of fat-tail Awassi sheep. The physical composition of the main wholesale cuts and dressing-out % were not affected by RUN supplementation or roughage:concentrate ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of effect of formaldehyde treatment of protein sources in ruminant have been variable. Peter et al (1971) reported a significant improvement in the performance of lambs fed soybean treated with formaldehyde, while others (Schmidt et al, 1973;Clark et al, 1974;Hassan et al, 1991) reported little or no effect of treating soybean meal with formaldehyde especially in those lambs fed a highconcentrate diet. Soybean treated with formaldehyde fed to steers did not improve daily gain; however it had a significant effect on improving the FCR (Spears et al, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%