1973
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.4.5889.392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Dietary Supplements of Wheat Bran and Cellulose on Faeces and Bowel Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
3
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
42
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 7 of the 18 volunteers there was no decrease in WGTT and hence a non-significant result for the group as a whole. Such variability in the response to bran has been reported before (Eastwood et al, 1973). A laxative dose may not be achieved if bran causes bloating or excess flatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In 7 of the 18 volunteers there was no decrease in WGTT and hence a non-significant result for the group as a whole. Such variability in the response to bran has been reported before (Eastwood et al, 1973). A laxative dose may not be achieved if bran causes bloating or excess flatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…pectin (Kay & Truswell, 1977). This has no effect on stool weight and thus the concentration of bile acids in faeces is increased; however wheat bran which has little if any effect on bile acid excretion, and increases stool weight causes a decrease in faecal bile acid concentration (Eastwood et al, 1973). Most epidemiological studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between stool weight and colonic disease (Burkitt et al, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stool weight is predominantly influenced by dietary fibre (Eastwood et al, 1973;Cummings et al, 1978). Dietary fibre can increase faecal bile acid excretion e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 (9/9) 3.9+0.5 (4/9) 5.1±1.5 (8/9) 6.1 ±0.6 (9/9) 6.3±0.9 (9/9) 3.2+0. 4 (2/9) < 2.0 (0/9) 3.7±1.0 (4/9) 10.5+0.3 (9/9) 10.2±0.2 (9/9) 9.6+0.2 (9/9) 10.4+0.3 (9/9) 7.6+0.8 (6/9) 8.0…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%