2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1172-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Different Cutting Patterns and Experimental Conditions on the Performance of a Conical Drag Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 is a scatter plot of the specific energy consumption calculated by Eq. 6 4 Experimental study A large number of rock cutting experiments have been done at home and abroad [2,[23][24][25][26][27].The experiments were conducted on the Coal-rock Cutting Machine (CCM) in Central South University. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Se W V Ttnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 is a scatter plot of the specific energy consumption calculated by Eq. 6 4 Experimental study A large number of rock cutting experiments have been done at home and abroad [2,[23][24][25][26][27].The experiments were conducted on the Coal-rock Cutting Machine (CCM) in Central South University. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Se W V Ttnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers discussed the effect of cutting speed before and it was reported that cutting speed has not a considerable effect during rock cutting, especially in low speeds (Nishimatsu 1972;Bilgin et al 2006Bilgin et al , 2012Copur et al 2017). He and Xu (2015) also analyzed it within the ranges of 4-20 mm/s and found that it is insignificant neither on tool forces nor on specific energy.…”
Section: Considerations About the Tool Forces And Specific Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the cutting depth and confining stress could also change the rock failure mode and cutting performance of a conical pick. Hurt [6] tested conical picks with wedge angles of 76, 80 and 90º at a 45º attack angle, and they found that the yield of the rock was independent of the attack angle (between 40 and 55º) and that the cutting force was clearly affected by the wedge angle. Park [7] found that the specific energies were lower at an attack angle of 60° than at an attack angle of 45° for cutting depths of 4 and 6 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%