2013
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40076-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of directional migration on prisoner’s dilemma game in a square domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We proceed by testing the robustness of conformityenhanced network reciprocity, first by considering an alternative formulation of the social dilemma. So far, to obtain results that are comparable with previous related works [77,78], we have focused on the weak prisoner's dilemma, which does not constitute the most adverse conditions for the successful evolution of cooperation since the punishment for mutual defection and the suckers payoff are equal (P = S = 0). To amend this, we consider the donation game, where the payoff ranking T > R > P > S corresponds to the true prisoner's dilemma.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We proceed by testing the robustness of conformityenhanced network reciprocity, first by considering an alternative formulation of the social dilemma. So far, to obtain results that are comparable with previous related works [77,78], we have focused on the weak prisoner's dilemma, which does not constitute the most adverse conditions for the successful evolution of cooperation since the punishment for mutual defection and the suckers payoff are equal (P = S = 0). To amend this, we consider the donation game, where the payoff ranking T > R > P > S corresponds to the true prisoner's dilemma.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Within the evolutionary game theory framework, after several sparse, early attempts to include mobility [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], it was only recently that the interest in the combined effects of mobility and cooperation in the PD game had a significant increase. Some level of information processing capability is required, for example, when the movement is strategy dependent [28,29] or driven by payoff [30][31][32][33], success [34][35][36][37] or the neighborhood composition [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. However, the simplest scenario is when mobility is diffusive [29,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When diffusion occurs on a lattice and the one agent per site constraint holds, this area exclusion couples the diffusivity of the agents with the free area. This dependence on density, on the other hand, is not immediately present in off-lattice systems with point-like particles [33,42,45,49,56]. Moreover, while on a lattice the number of simultaneous interactions is limited by its coordination number, there is no such restriction on the number of point-like particles within the range of interaction in off-lattice systems (unless it is explicitly included as in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%