2007
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Disinfection of Combined Agar/Alginate Impressions on the Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Casts

Abstract: This study investigated the effects of disinfection of combined agar/alginate impressions on the dimensional accuracy of resultant stone casts. Impressions of a master cast designed to simulate an abutment tooth were prepared by combining each of two brands of cartridge-form agar impression materials with an alginate impression material. The impressions were immersed in 1% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes or 2% glutaraldehyde for 30 minutes. The remaining impressions were sprayed with these two disinfectants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other techniques proposed to acquire 3D surface models of the crowns include 3D surface scanning of the dental impressions and casts. However, the accuracy of this approach is limited by the accuracy of the impression or dental cast, which can be influenced by many factors including impression material type, tray type, impression technique, pouring technique, storage time, disinfection material and the presence of deep undercut and severely mal‐posed or tilted teeth (35–48). Albeit in an ideally controlled situation, the accuracy of dental impressions can be within 25 μm (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques proposed to acquire 3D surface models of the crowns include 3D surface scanning of the dental impressions and casts. However, the accuracy of this approach is limited by the accuracy of the impression or dental cast, which can be influenced by many factors including impression material type, tray type, impression technique, pouring technique, storage time, disinfection material and the presence of deep undercut and severely mal‐posed or tilted teeth (35–48). Albeit in an ideally controlled situation, the accuracy of dental impressions can be within 25 μm (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended that the impressions be stored in sealed bags following treatment with glutaraldehyde or NaOCl (1,15). Glutaraldehyde is considered a high-level disinfectant (16) that should eliminate some spores, the bacillus responsible for tuberculosis, vegetative bacteria, fungi, and viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Irreversible hidrokolloid ölçü materyali, sodyum hipoklorit ve glutaraldehit dezenfeksiyon solüsyonla-rıyla hem spreyleme hem daldırma yöntemi ile dezenfekte edilmiĢ, hacimsel stabilite açısından en uygun yöntemin sodyum hipoklorit ile spreylendikten sonra 10 dk ağzı kilitli poĢette bekletilmesi olduğu belirtilmiĢtir. 35 Muzaffar ve arkadaĢları iki farklı marka aljinatı distile su, sodyum hipoklorit ve Perform ID olmak üzere üç ayrı solüsyonda bekletmiĢler ve tüm örneklerde büzülme olduğunu bildirmiĢlerdir. 31 Irreversible hidrokolloid örnekler bakteri ile kontamine edilmiĢ ardından sodyum hipoklorit, hidrojen peroksit ve alkol bazlı solüsyonlarla sprey yöntemiyle dezenfekte edilip 10 dk ağzı kilitli bir poĢette bekletilmiĢlerdir.…”
Section: (Tablo 1)unclassified