2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of double skin envelopes on natural ventilation and heating loads in office buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar numerical results are also achieved in studies more focused on comparisons between DSFs and single skin options [44,[66][67][68][69][70]. Comparable savings have been observed by 18.7% during winter months in Korea [71], by 20.5% in the restoration of industrial buildings in Italy [72], and by 18% in real monitoring of three DSF buildings in Germany [73].…”
Section: Heatingsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar numerical results are also achieved in studies more focused on comparisons between DSFs and single skin options [44,[66][67][68][69][70]. Comparable savings have been observed by 18.7% during winter months in Korea [71], by 20.5% in the restoration of industrial buildings in Italy [72], and by 18% in real monitoring of three DSF buildings in Germany [73].…”
Section: Heatingsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, there are also less positive findings that suggest the need for mechanical means to ventilate the building for more than half a year [71,78]. The difficulty of ventilation via DSFs has been assessed also by Gratia and De Herde [90] who studied the effects of wind direction, building orientation, openings size, and cross vs. single-sided ventilation in a DSF prototypical building.…”
Section: Dsf Cooling Loads Reduction Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [5] also proved that DSFs can be used to reduce energy consumptions in buildings during both heating and cooling seasons while maintaining indoor comfort levels. However, studies conducted by Tascon [6] revealed that DSFs tend to experience overheating problems during warm seasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researchers have raised the overheating problems associated with DSFs and come up with several solutions to dispel the problems. Tascon [5] raised that the main causes of overheating in DSF which included ineffective removal of heat stored within the DSF system, inappropriate location and size of shading devices, and inadequate operations of the DSF for specific thermal environmental conditions. Jager et al [6] and Wigginton et al [7] reported physical considerations at design stage of DSFs such as ensuring a minimum distance between the outer and inner skins and adjusting the sizes of openings for better ventilation in the cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design and perspectives of the double skin envelope and its performance according to the solar controls, natural ventilation, shading device, solar photovoltaic, active facades such as active window strategies, glass selection, and cavity depth were evaluated [1,2]. Diverse performance tests presented the effectiveness of double skin envelope for saving heating and cooling energy based on the proper ventilation strategies [3][4][5][6]. In particular, besides the remarkable reduction of the heating energy, cooling energy was also significantly saved compared to the singles skin enveloped-buildings when the natural ventilation strategy or the passive thermal mass was applied [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%