Effects of dynamic taping on shoulder joint proprioception

Park, So-Young; Kim, Minji; So-Eun, Seol; Chan, Hwang; Ji-Su, Hong; Kim, Ho; Shin, Won-Seob

doi:10.14474/ptrs.2020.9.4.269

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The iliotibial band plays a role in anterior–posterior and lateral laxity [ 38 ]. Third, dynamic tape presented good multidirectional elasticity, providing somatosensory input and enhancing proprioception in previous research [ 21 ]. Furthermore, proprioception is correlated with knee laxity [ 39 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…There are many kinds of tape commonly used by athletes, such as rigid athletic tapes, kinesiology tapes, and leukotapes. Compared to Kinesio tape and rigid tape, dynamic taping is a newly developed technique with better elasticity and multidirectional extensibility, no rigid endpoint, and stronger resistance and recoil [ 20 ], providing somatosensory input and enhancing proprioception in the previous research [ 21 ]. However, clinical research is extremely scarce.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dynamic Taping Improves Landing Biomechanics in Young Volleyball Athletes

Lin

Lai

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poor landing biomechanics such as hip adduction, internal rotation, and knee valgus have been recognized as modifiable risk factors of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Dynamic taping is a newly developed technique with better elasticity and extensibility, which could change the landing biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to identify whether dynamic taping could improve lower limb biomechanics in athletes. Forty-two high school volleyball athletes (21 males and 21 females) participated in the study. Biomechanical properties, including the landing error scoring system (LESS) and anterior–posterior knee laxity, were evaluated before and after the application of dynamic tape while athletes performed the jump-landing task. As a result, we found that dynamic tape significantly reduced the faulty landing strategy by an average of 0.64 errors in all volleyball athletes. The effect induced by dynamic tape was more prominent in female athletes and high-risk athletes (1.1 errors). Furthermore, the application of dynamic tape improved anterior–posterior knee laxity, especially in female athletes (p < 0.001). In conclusion, we found that dynamic tape provided a short-term, passive, and clinically significant means to normalize inadequate biomechanics during landing in athlete groups, which could have a protective effect and further alleviate the risk of ACL injury.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Taping Improves Landing Biomechanics in Young Volleyball Athletes

Lin

Lai

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The tapes were classified as either rigid or elastic tapes based on the description provided in the respective studies. Overall, sixty studies had utilized elastic tapes [ 48 , 50 – 54 , 56 – 58 , 65 – 67 , 74 – 79 , 81 , 82 , 84 , 85 , 87 , 88 , 90 , 100 – 102 , 105 – 108 , 111 , 113 , 114 , 116 – 118 , 120 , 123 , 124 , 126 , 129 – 132 , 137 – 147 , 153 , 154 ], and 33 studies had used rigid tapes [ 36 , 39 , 55 , 59 – 62 , 64 , 80 , 83 , 86 , 103 , 104 , 110 , 115 , 119 , 122 , 125 , 127 , 128 , 133 – 136 , 148 – 152 ]. Additionally, four studies had compared the efficacy across two different tapes.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven different types of proprioceptive assessments were used in the included studies to evaluate proprioceptive performance. Here, 71 of the included studies had used joint sense tests [ 36 , 39 , 48 , 50 , 54 – 61 , 65 – 68 , 74 – 78 , 81 – 88 , 100 – 107 , 109 , 110 , 112 – 116 , 118 , 119 , 122 , 124 – 126 , 128 , 129 , 131 , 132 , 134 , 136 – 140 , 142 – 150 , 152 , 153 ], four studies had used threshold to detect of passive motion test [ 62 , 111 , 127 , 133 ], four had used active movement extent discrimination accuracy test [ 51 , 52 , 80 , 90 ], one had used proprioceptive feedback index (i.e., derived from repositioning error and the correlation between instant movement and prototype instant movement) [ 130 ], one study had used active displacement test [ 154 ], one study had added proprioceptive test accuracy scores (i.e., moving target program on an isokinetic dynamometer) [ 120 ], one had used proprioceptive index (i.e., x, y, rotation values) [ 141 ], and one had evaluated the percentage of exact joint position sense trial [ 123 ]. Additionally, seven studies had performed assessment of joint position sense as well as threshold to detection of passive motion [ 53 , 64 , 79 , 108 , 117 , 135 , 151 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of taping on joint proprioception: a systematic review with between and within group meta-analysis

Ghai,

Narciss

2024

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taping is increasingly used to manage proprioceptive deficits, but existing reviews on its impact have shortcomings. To accurately assess the effects of taping, a separate meta-analyses for different population groups and tape types is needed. Therefore, both between- and within-group meta-analyses are needed to evaluate the influence of taping on proprioception. According to PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted across seven databases (Web of Science, PEDro, Pubmed, EBSCO, Scopus, ERIC, SportDiscus, Psychinfo) and one register (CENTRAL) using the keywords “tape” and “proprioception”. Out of 1372 records, 91 studies, involving 2718 individuals, met the inclusion criteria outlined in the systematic review. The meta-analyses revealed a significant between and within-group reduction in repositioning errors with taping compared to no tape (Hedge’s g: -0.39, p < 0.001) and placebo taping (Hedge’s g: -1.20, p < 0.001). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses further confirmed the reliability of the overall between and within-group analyses. The between-group results further demonstrated that both elastic tape and rigid tape had similar efficacy to improve repositioning errors in both healthy and fatigued populations. Additional analyses on the threshold to detection of passive motion and active movement extent discrimination apparatus revealed no significant influence of taping. In conclusion, the findings highlight the potential of taping to enhance joint repositioning accuracy compared to no tape or placebo taping. Further research needs to uncover underlying mechanisms and refine the application of taping for diverse populations with proprioceptive deficits.

show abstract

“…Further discussion on materials is provided in Chapter 7. At the shoulder and ankle joints, adding tape has been observed to improve proprioception, assessed as JPS (Park et al, 2020;Alawna, Unver and Yuksel, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of bandaging techniques and shot types on wrist motion in boxing

Gatt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hand-Wrist injuries account for the highest number of injuries in Boxing. Bandaging of the hand-wrist region is a common and historic practice in this sport. However, there is no literature exploring the effect of bandaging techniques on wrist motion in boxing or other combat sports. This programme of research was aimed at improving the knowledge of wrist kinematics on impact in boxing through a rigorous scientific approach. Three novel studies were generated and published in peer-reviewed journals The first study describes a new method for quantifying wrist motion in boxing using an electromagnetic tracking system. Surrogate testing procedure utilising a polyamide hand and forearm shape, and in-vivo testing procedure utilising 29 elite boxers, were used to assess the accuracy and repeatability of the system. Two-dimensional kinematic analysis was used to calculate wrist angles using photogrammetry, whilst the data from the electromagnetic tracking system was processed with Visual 3D software. The electromagnetic tracking system agreed with the video-based system in both the surrogate (<0.2°) and quasi-static testing (<6°). Both systems showed a good intraclass coefficient of reliability (ICCs >0.9). In the punch testing, the electromagnetic tracking system showed good reliability (ICCs >0.8) and substantial reliability (ICCs >0.6) for flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation angles respectively. The second study quantified wrist motion during in-vivo impact testing procedures for two types of shots, Jab (straight arm shot) and Hook (bent arm short), with 29 elite boxers. For both shots, flexion and ulnar deviation occurred concurrent on impact, with a mean and standard deviation of 9.3±1.9° and 4.7±1.2° respectively for Jab shots, and 5.5±1.1° and 3.3±1.1° respectively for Hook shots, supporting dart throwing motion at the wrist. For both Jab & Hook, wrist motion on impact occurred within >30% and >20% respectively of total available active range of motion, with wristangles greater in both flexion (t=9.0, p<0.001, d=1.7) and ulnar deviation (t=8.4, p<0.001, d=1.6) for Jab compared to Hook shots. The third study investigated the effects of bandaging techniques on wrist motion on impact during two shot types, Jab (straight arm shot) and Hook (bent arm short), in 18 elite male boxers wearing either bandage only or bandage plus tape. For both motions, a significant (p<0.001) interaction between bandage techniques and shot types, and significant (p<0.001) main effects for bandaging techniques (η2=0.580-0.729) and shot types (η2=0.165-0.280), were observed. For straight and bent arm shots, wrist motion on impact occurred within 50% and 40% respectively of total active wrist motion for bandage only compared to within 20% and 15% for bandage plus tape. Time to peak wrist angle on impact increased significantly (p<0.001) by 1.2-1.4 for both shot types when adding tape to bandage. The information from this programme of research contributes to knowledge through a better understanding of wrist kinematics on impact in boxing, useful towards both injury prevention and management strategies. Further, the methodology and knowledge discussed is applicable to wider clinical and scientific settings.

show abstract

Effects of dynamic taping on shoulder joint proprioception

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

Dynamic Taping Improves Landing Biomechanics in Young Volleyball Athletes

Dynamic Taping Improves Landing Biomechanics in Young Volleyball Athletes

Influence of taping on joint proprioception: a systematic review with between and within group meta-analysis

Effects of bandaging techniques and shot types on wrist motion in boxing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About