“…The mass spectrometry signature quality improved using methanol treatment, showing the preservation of biomacromolecules on cell surfaces (Qian et al ., ). In a related study of the effect of three common inactivation methods (heat, formaldehyde, alcohol) on the confocal resonance Raman spectra of purple nonsulfur bacteria, ethanol performed better than formaldehyde, whereas heat treatment had a strong, adverse effect on the resonant Raman spectrum (Kniggendorf et al ., ). Overall, compared to formaldehyde, there are several advantages of using alcohols: (i) lower toxicity and easy handling, (ii) limited crosslinking, while formaldehyde crosslinking masks available specific binding sites of antigens hampering immunohistochemistry or bioactivity, (iii) superior ultrastructure in comparison to formaldehyde treated cells (Dapson, ; van Essen et al ., ; Sjostedt et al ., ), (iv) permit immunological staining for most antibodies if needed downstream (van Essen et al., ).…”