2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of feathermoss removal, thinning and fertilization on lodgepole pine growth, soil microclimate and stand nitrogen dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds well with our Wnding that the cover of P. schreberi decreased both in the snow removal treatment and in the increased insulation treatment. P. schreberi dominates the moss layer in many boreal forests and not only in our study (Startsev et al 2007). An experimental removal of insulation provided by this species results in increased summer soil temperature and a prolonged snow-free period, yet leading to a decreased minimum winter temperature of the soil, especially when accompanied by shallow snow cover (Startsev et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This corresponds well with our Wnding that the cover of P. schreberi decreased both in the snow removal treatment and in the increased insulation treatment. P. schreberi dominates the moss layer in many boreal forests and not only in our study (Startsev et al 2007). An experimental removal of insulation provided by this species results in increased summer soil temperature and a prolonged snow-free period, yet leading to a decreased minimum winter temperature of the soil, especially when accompanied by shallow snow cover (Startsev et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Vascular plants may beneWt mosses by generating a favourable microclimate, as has been suggested for both grassland and woodland (Ingerpuu et al 2005;Startsev et al 2007). More frequent, however, are accounts of negative relationships between vascular plant and moss biomass, reXecting suppressed moss growth through leaf litter deposition and shading, despite mosses having a generally low light compensation point (Bergamini et al 2001;Malmer et al 2003, Van der Wal et al 2005Startsev et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Mosses may also ameliorate autumn and winter severity by providing an insulating layer which can buVer soil against low temperatures and protect vascular plants from frost damage (Gornall et al 2007;Startsev et al 2007). Maintaining warmer soils in winter may aVect over-winter nutrient dynamics, which, in turn, can have an impact upon growing season productivity (Chapin et al 2002).…”
Section: Positive Impacts Of Mossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Downregulation of their N 2 -fixation activity has the potential to off-set atmospheric N r inputs, and thereby 'buffer' the supply of N to primary production [5,6]. Additionally, bryophytes thermally insulate underlying soils [7] and produce litter that is highly recalcitrant [8], which collectively diminish soil C and N mineralization rates [4]. Changes in bryophyte biomass in response to N r deposition therefore have the potential to cause soil C losses, while inversely coupling above-ground responses by influencing N mineralization and availability to vascular plants [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%