2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-017-9860-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of federal socioeconomic contracting preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the findings to more traditional approaches, we also conduct analysis with a more standard difference in difference estimator that has been widely employed in numerous recent publications in SBEJ (Amamou et al, 2022 ; Bailey, 2017 ; Biancalani et al, 2022 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Dosi et al, 2012 ; Lewis, 2017 ) that show various specifications and empirical strategies of this approach. There seems to be no consensus on which strategies are preferred, with scholars trading increasingly restrictive assumptions with solutions to various issues, such as heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the findings to more traditional approaches, we also conduct analysis with a more standard difference in difference estimator that has been widely employed in numerous recent publications in SBEJ (Amamou et al, 2022 ; Bailey, 2017 ; Biancalani et al, 2022 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Dosi et al, 2012 ; Lewis, 2017 ) that show various specifications and empirical strategies of this approach. There seems to be no consensus on which strategies are preferred, with scholars trading increasingly restrictive assumptions with solutions to various issues, such as heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since SMB can potentially improve socio-economic situation in a region, public sector is focused on creating enabling environment for those entities and providing assistance to them. The most common support measures for small and medium-sized entrepreneurship are subsidies from regional budgets [6,7,8,9,10,11], government lending programmes [12], tax exemptions and simplified taxation [13] and other preferences and benefits for such companies [14,15,16]. Yet not even the examination of these support measures is the most essential issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is difficult to establish success for programs that are aimed at such diverse target groups. For example, if a company is successful over time, it might have been one that would have been successful on its own, without governmental assistance, in which case, then, the government's involvement would have been unnecessary, and perhaps a waste of taxpayers' limited resources (Lewis, 2017). small businesses, especially minority-owned businesses with limited numbers of employees, have had great difficulty in managing this challenge (West, 2023).…”
Section: How To Measure Program Successmentioning
confidence: 99%