2015
DOI: 10.3102/0034654314564881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes

Abstract: In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students' learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct answer (KCR; 0.32). EF … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
348
2
33

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 502 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
17
348
2
33
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations in literature review is the inability to cover the whole literature (Van der Kleij, Feskens, & Eggen, 2015). Another limitation of the present study is the use of only WoS and ERIC databases due to their significance in the field of study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the limitations in literature review is the inability to cover the whole literature (Van der Kleij, Feskens, & Eggen, 2015). Another limitation of the present study is the use of only WoS and ERIC databases due to their significance in the field of study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research shows some types of feedback are more powerful than others, such as providing cues or reinforcement (Hattie, 2009;Hattie & Gan, 2011;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996;Li, Cao, & Mok, 2016). Moreover, feedback can be given in different ways: computer-generated feedback (Adesina, Stone, Batmaz, & Jones, 2014;Fyfe, 2016;Panaoura, 2012;van der Kleij, Feskens, & Eggen, 2015), formative versus standardized or interim assessment (Konstantopoulos, Li, …”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback about self merely relay data about the characteristic of the learner, not the task, or the effective processing of the task. However, feedback about self-as-a-person may positively impact learners' motivation and task persistence (Bond, Smith, Baker, & Hattie, 2000;Hattie & Timperley, 2007;Van der Kleij, et al, 2015), so it is not without value. Accordingly, Nicol and Milligan (2006) set forth seven principles of good feedback in the context of technology-supported assessments.…”
Section: Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because it scrutinizes strategies students use to detect errors, a mechanism that supplies useful information leading to the modification of faulty techniques. Additionally, it is useful in illuminating the need to seek help (Balzer, Doherty, & O'Connor, 1989;Purdie, Hattie, & Douglas, 1996;Carver & Scheier, 1990;Van der Kleij, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation