2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand—Findings from a field trial in Austria

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, due to their higher level of affluence, they were not compelled to focus on savings. Our results confirm the findings of Schleich et al [21] that the effects of displays differ across household groups and the degree of affluence. We nuance these results by also showing the importance of previous experience with monitoring of electricity for the effects of feedback.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, due to their higher level of affluence, they were not compelled to focus on savings. Our results confirm the findings of Schleich et al [21] that the effects of displays differ across household groups and the degree of affluence. We nuance these results by also showing the importance of previous experience with monitoring of electricity for the effects of feedback.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Murtagh, Gatersleben and Uzzell [20] find a high degree of variation in terms of the use of energy and displays and discuss the role of people's previous experience with energy savings. Schleich et al [21] analyzed the effects of feedback on electricity consumption in Austria, and found that the effects are dependent on the total electricity consumption of the households. Middle consumption households seem to be more responsive to feedback than households with either low or high levels of consumption.…”
Section: The Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…a possible explanation may be that in this study customers with a relatively high consumption level were selected well above an average consumption for the population that is close to 200 kWh per month. at the same time it could be that income level for high level consumers in latvia is considerably lower than for other eU countries that might explain why in this study there was not observed reduction of feedback effect at higher consumption what was reported by Schleich et al [9] in the trail carried out in austria. also unexpected results were demonstrated in the consumption range 250-399 kWh per month, where almost no feedback effect was identified.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…However, it showed that for households in the 30th to the 70th percentile of electricity consumption there was a statistically significant feedback effect on electricity consumption but for percentiles below or above this range feedback appeared to have no effect. The trial reports savings of around 4.5% for the average household [9].…”
Section: Factors Influencing Feedback Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, very few of those concern the Netherlands or look at appliance electricity consumption. Policies aiming to reduce it by providing smart meter feedback to consumers are key for meeting the EU intended target of 20% reduction in primary energy use by 2020 relative to 2005 baseline levels [8]. An explicit target of at least 80% smart meter adoption by 2020 has been set in the Netherlands in line with EU directives [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%