2015
DOI: 10.14798/73.4.846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFFECTS OF FEEDING REGIME ON GROWTH FEED CONVERSION AND SIZE VARIATION OF Silurus glanis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, PER presented almost a constant intergroups value of 2.50 (±0.04), indicating the higher efficiency with which the catfish have converted nutrients from feed into body mass and consequently, in nutrients for human food supply. Our results reinforced the data obtained by, Havasi et al (2015) in the experiment presented above, on European catfish juveniles fed with a commercial diet having 49 % crude protein, with good results of the feed intake (FCR=0.77±0.07, PER=2.7±0.2) for the 3 times/day of the meal's frequency. In another study about four experimental diets with different percentages of protein, during a 112 days trial on European catfish fingerlings (46,4 g), Bekcan et al (2006) obtained values quite similar to ours of the feed intake for the group fed with 40 % protein level (FCR = 0.97 ± 0.010, PER = 2.62 ± 0.028), but smaller SGR=0.74 ± 0.002 %/day in the conditions of ad libitum distribution of the food, twice/day.…”
Section: Growth Performancessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, PER presented almost a constant intergroups value of 2.50 (±0.04), indicating the higher efficiency with which the catfish have converted nutrients from feed into body mass and consequently, in nutrients for human food supply. Our results reinforced the data obtained by, Havasi et al (2015) in the experiment presented above, on European catfish juveniles fed with a commercial diet having 49 % crude protein, with good results of the feed intake (FCR=0.77±0.07, PER=2.7±0.2) for the 3 times/day of the meal's frequency. In another study about four experimental diets with different percentages of protein, during a 112 days trial on European catfish fingerlings (46,4 g), Bekcan et al (2006) obtained values quite similar to ours of the feed intake for the group fed with 40 % protein level (FCR = 0.97 ± 0.010, PER = 2.62 ± 0.028), but smaller SGR=0.74 ± 0.002 %/day in the conditions of ad libitum distribution of the food, twice/day.…”
Section: Growth Performancessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Correlating with the similarity of the recorded R 2 values, this situation suggesting a possible competition for food even in the experimental variant with higher feeding rate R2. Taking into account our results reported to those found by Havasi et al (2015), the continuous repartition of the daily food could be a better solution for catfish feeding because, besides elevated feeding rates, increasing the feeding frequency could be the answer in order to obtain a homogenous population in aggressive specie like Silurus glanis. The coefficient of variation (CV %) recorded a larger variation by analysing the final moment (R1, 27.73 %→30.34% > R2, 23.87%→24.44%).…”
Section: Fish Conditionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A very important factor for ensuring the success of livestock, poultry, and aquatic organisms farming, is to determine the appropriate feeding rate in order to achieve optimal and economic growth rates (Hasan, 2000). However, it might be difficult to successfully determine optimum feeding rate for fishes since it is dependent on numerous interrelated factors including diet quality, environmental conditions, stocking density, feeding frequency, selected species, initial weight, and animal size (Brett & Groves, 1979; Havasi et al, 2015; Jobling, 1995; Silva, Gomes, & Brandão, 2007). To date, a large body of research has attempted to determine optimal feeding rate and frequency for cultural aquatic animals, including different sturgeon species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%