2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-015-2423-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fine wood on macroinvertebrate drift in four boreal forest streams

Abstract: Most studies of stream wood have focused on pieces C0.1 m diameter. However, this approach may overlook an important feature of small streams, where wood \0.1 m can constitute the majority of wood pieces. We examined the effect of fine wood (FW) on local drift of stream macroinvertebrates. The study was carried out at seven sites in four boreal forest streams, from early June to mid-August 2011. This was done by anchoring bundles of FW at each site and measuring drift upstream and downstream of each bundle. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, researchers need to consider density dependence in fish populations and the causes of density dependence, such as food availability, habitat quality, flood refuge, drought refuge, and thermal refuge. Also, far more studies have examined the ecological and geomorphic influences of large wood, but the relationships with small wood (<1 m length and 10 cm diameter) have received far less attention (Ward and Aumen, 1986; Enefalk and Bergman, 2016; Galia et al ., 2018). Addressing other gaps in large wood research, such as attention to dynamics and roles of wood on floodplains, can be complicated by the need for cross‐discipline collaboration, such as between terrestrial and stream ecologists.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, researchers need to consider density dependence in fish populations and the causes of density dependence, such as food availability, habitat quality, flood refuge, drought refuge, and thermal refuge. Also, far more studies have examined the ecological and geomorphic influences of large wood, but the relationships with small wood (<1 m length and 10 cm diameter) have received far less attention (Ward and Aumen, 1986; Enefalk and Bergman, 2016; Galia et al ., 2018). Addressing other gaps in large wood research, such as attention to dynamics and roles of wood on floodplains, can be complicated by the need for cross‐discipline collaboration, such as between terrestrial and stream ecologists.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the mesohabitat scale, the richness and abundance of macroinvertebrates in fast habitats (riffles) were linked to the pronounced variability of depth [65]. On the contrary, at the microhabitat scale, most of the studies focused on the relationships between macroinvertebrate distribution and habitat attributes, especially hydraulic parameters such as roughness, Reynolds number, shear velocity, and Froude number [20,21,33,69,70]. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the mesohabitat scale can reasonably summarize microhabitat conditions, thereby streamlining sampling efforts in terms of time and resources [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of environmental attributes, particularly hydraulics, in shaping macroinvertebrate assemblages at the genus or family level has been extensively explored [18,30,31]. However, the significance of other factors such as detritus, woody debris, and aquatic vegetation and their influence on macroinvertebrate communities, remains underexplored [32][33][34][35][36]. Furthermore, the integration of biological traits, reflecting species adaptation to the environment, into the study of macroinvertebrate communities has recently gained prominence [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shifts in the cover, structure, and typical stand‐age of riparian vegetation that we have documented likely have a web of implications for the properties of riparian habitats for moose, beavers, hares, songbirds, and other wildlife. In addition, riparian “greening” could impact aquatic biota in clearwater streams, since the addition of coarse woody debris and plant biomass is known to stimulate increases in invertebrate populations, which in turn have cascading aquatic ecosystem effects (Enefalk & Bergman, 2016; Melody & Richardson, 2004). These shifts could also serve as a bioindicator of change to physical processes and disturbance regime on subarctic floodplains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%