2004
DOI: 10.1644/bos-115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Foraging Activity on Sexual Segregation in Mule Deer

Abstract: We retrospectively tested whether differences in activity patterns and foraging efficiency by males and females were responsible for sexual segregation in mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). These deer spatially segregated by sex during the dry season (May-October), which encompassed parturition, and aggregated during the wet season (November-April), which included rut. Activity did not differ among types of social groups of deer (mixed-sex, adult male, or adult female), but was greater during the dry season than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that investigate competing hypotheses to explain segregation often make efforts to eliminate all but one hypothesis as a likely explanation (Ruckstuhl and Neuhaus 2002; Bowyer and Kie 2004). This becomes difficult when assessing individuals in the wild due to lack of environmental controls, ignorance of early life circumstances and inability to conduct experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that investigate competing hypotheses to explain segregation often make efforts to eliminate all but one hypothesis as a likely explanation (Ruckstuhl and Neuhaus 2002; Bowyer and Kie 2004). This becomes difficult when assessing individuals in the wild due to lack of environmental controls, ignorance of early life circumstances and inability to conduct experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, we hypothesized that locations where the probability of a female contact was high (H 3 ) would be most closely associated with areas of high CWD risk because of the higher social interactions among females, especially within groups (Schauber et al, 2007;Grear et al, 2010). Because males have a high prevalence along with elevated mixed-sex contacts due to polygynous mating structure (Bowyer and Kie, 2004;Mejía-Salazar et al, 2017), we also hypothesized a close association between locations of rut contacts and where the risk of the disease is high (H 4 ). Finally, we hypothesized that locations of a contact made by a deer with an individual from a different group (i.e., between-group contact locations) regardless of sex would increase CWD exposure and would be associated with where the risk of CWD was highest (H 5 ).…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in a number of other ruminant species (e.g., mule deer Odocoileus hemionus [19], red deer [33], bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis [34], Alpine ibex [35]), fallow deer groups have a rather short lifetime whatever their composition (see [24], this paper). Our findings further show that the probability for fallow deer groups to split up progressively increases with their size.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Group Splitting-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, prediction (i) was satisfied: as expected on the basis of the 'activity budget' hypothesis, activity synchrony was less frequent in mixed-sex groups than in single-sex groups or at least all-female groups. While this kind of pattern is certainly not universal in sexually-dimorphic ruminants [19,40], a lower synchrony in mixed-sex than in single-sex groups has also been found in red deer [11,14], bighorn sheep [30] and Alpine ibex [41]. However, such a finding is not sufficient for the 'activity budget' hypothesis to be considered as correct.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Group Splitting-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation