ABSTRACT:Liming was and still is carried out in many European forests since the beginning of the 1980s. Main objectives of compensation liming is to neutralize actual acidic deposition in order to prevent further soil acidification, to increase base saturation and acid buffering capacity of the soil. This paper evaluates results from long-term liming experiments throughout Europe using different amounts and forms of liming materials. Differences in forest ecosystem reaction to liming can be caused by amount, form and frequency of the application, and by the solubility, reaction kinetics, contents and composition of the material used. Furthermore, other factors like climate, site history, management, environmental conditions (e.g. actual and historical deposition rates), humus form, C/N ratio, nitrogen stores, and the soil chemical properties (e.g. pH, base saturation, CEC) may strongly influence the effects of liming treatments. Element budgets of forested ecosystems on a plot or watershed scale provide a very useful tool to integrate the various effects of additional Mg inputs via liming/fertilization. Keywords: acid deposition; soil acidification; element budget; lime; dolomite; fertilization; soil pH; base saturation; buffer capacity; site history 36 J. FOR. SCI., 52, 2006 (Special Issue): [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and an increase in cation exchange capacity of up to 51 kmol c /kg in the humus layers of the investigated sites. In the upper mineral soil changes were much smaller, in some cases even negative. In soil solutions pH values increased by up to two units after liming (LUNDSTRÖM et al. 2003). Accordingly, aluminum concentrations decreased generally, in some cases liming lead to a short-term increase, when cation exchange reactions released higher amounts of adsorbed Al. Liming generally resulted in clearly increased concentrations of nitrate and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil solutions. This finding is mainly due to increased microbial acitivity, soil respiration and mineralization of soil organic matter (SOM; PERSSON et al. 1991) and could result in a risk for further mineral soil acidification and pollution of ground and surface waters as well as for substantial losses of SOM stores from the soil. KREUTZER (1995) reported losses of up to 23% of total carbon and 13% of total nitrogen from the humus layer after liming (6.5-7 t C/ha and 170 kg N/ha, respectively). A major part of the carbon losses was contributed to increased respiration losses and release from the soil as CO 2 . Effects of surface liming on mineralization and NO 3 leaching seem to be highly depending on the N-status of the site. An important indicator seems to be the C/N-ratio (PERSSON et al. 1989). Another possible risk of surface lime treatments is the mobilization of heavy metals from polluted humus layers and leaching from the soil in form of metal-organic complexes.In general, pH increases are correlated with the applied amount of dolomite. In the Hoeglwald experiment the application of 4,000 kg/ha dolomiti...