2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fuel reduction on birds in pitch pine–scrub oak barrens of the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found the pattern of post-disturbance colonization similar to past studies, with prairie warblers colonizing at low densities after initial logging and increasing up to 4-5 years after treatment (King et al, 2011;Schlossberg and King, 2009). As treated pitch pine matured, we also witnessed a decline in bird density as found in other studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We found the pattern of post-disturbance colonization similar to past studies, with prairie warblers colonizing at low densities after initial logging and increasing up to 4-5 years after treatment (King et al, 2011;Schlossberg and King, 2009). As treated pitch pine matured, we also witnessed a decline in bird density as found in other studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The increase in bird densities as sites recovered from logging appeared to correspond to prairie warblers' habitat requirements, principally dense woody shrubs suitable for nesting (Nolan, 1978;Slay, 2010). Average shrub height in the first year or two after harvesting was typically lower than the height range of most selected prairie warbler nest sites in our study (Akresh, 2012;King et al, 2011), potentially accounting for the relatively low densities of birds in the years directly following logging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These new patches would thus favour open-habitat species Kelly et al 2014) and associated ecosystem services (Whelan et al 2008). We also suggest that further funding of sustainable forest harvesting should be considered in the study area to offset the loss of open habitats and to prevent the occurrence of high-intensity fires as a result of fuel accumulation (Stephens 1998;Drapeau et al 2000;King et al 2011;Fenton et al 2013).…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of Rewilding: Implications For Consmentioning
confidence: 88%