2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of glycerol intake and body tilt on otoacoustic emissions reflect labyrinthine pressure changes in Menière’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that delayed evoked and distortion product OAE amplitudes were lower in the non-affected ears of MD patients than in the healthy control subjects (21). Offering a reliable evaluation on the functional condition of the inner ear, OAE has a validity of 50% in the diagnosis of EH, and is not sufficiently sensitive and specific for MD (22).…”
Section: Otoacoustic Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that delayed evoked and distortion product OAE amplitudes were lower in the non-affected ears of MD patients than in the healthy control subjects (21). Offering a reliable evaluation on the functional condition of the inner ear, OAE has a validity of 50% in the diagnosis of EH, and is not sufficiently sensitive and specific for MD (22).…”
Section: Otoacoustic Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the degree of endolymphatic hydrops, several kinds of indirect measurements have been attempted [Morrison et al, 1980;Mateijsen et al, 2001;Lin et al, 2006;Mom et al, 2009]. The oldest one is electrocochleography (ECochG), in which enhancement of the summation potential relative to the action potential is considered to reflect the endolymphatic hydrops [Morrison et al, 1980;Iseli and Gibson, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent survey of members of the American Otology Society or American Neurotology Society reported that more than half of respondents did not use ECochG at all due to a variability in results and a lack of correlation with patients' symptoms [Nguyen et al, 2010]. Recently, the testing of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) [Lin et al, 2006], otoacoustic emissions [Mom et al, 2009], perilymphatic pressure using the tympanic displacement analyzer [Mateijsen et al, 2001] and the use of three-dimensional, fluid-attenuated recovery magnetic resonance imaging with administration of an intratympanic gadolinium-based contrast agent [Fukuoka et al, 2010] have all been reported to be useful for detecting endolymphatic hydrops. However, so far, none of these tests are able to offer the appropriate levels of sensitivity and specificity to make them suitable as routine diagnostic tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suggests that manipulations of ILP and of the ear's stiffness might induce larger effects in hydropic than normal ears. To test this idea, body tilt was used by Mom et al (2009) for producing ILP changes, and the posture-related phase shifts of transient-evoked OAEs around 1 kHz were found to be three times larger in MD ears than in control and contralateral asymptomatic ears. The present work elaborates on this observation with the help of distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs), allowing cochlear status to be monitored at a chosen frequency (here: 1 kHz) every few seconds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%