2002
DOI: 10.37855/jah.2002.v04i01.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of grafting method and height on the growth of grafted plants and production of feathers in spur-type apple cultivars at nursery stage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…55.22, 53.25 and 52.85, respectively. Whereas, Tbudding done at a height of 1 m (T 10 ) gave minimum number of internodes (10.06) and were at par with chip budding (11.56) at 1 m height (T 11 ).These results are in accordance to the findings of Kumar and Ananda (2002) who reported highest number of internodes through tongue grafting method in apple.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…55.22, 53.25 and 52.85, respectively. Whereas, Tbudding done at a height of 1 m (T 10 ) gave minimum number of internodes (10.06) and were at par with chip budding (11.56) at 1 m height (T 11 ).These results are in accordance to the findings of Kumar and Ananda (2002) who reported highest number of internodes through tongue grafting method in apple.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In several fruit trees, numerous grafting techniques have been evaluated and the best grafting method has been introduced, but complete failure of other grafting approaches were rarely reported (El-Deen and El-Rhman, 2011; Kumar and Ananda, 2002;Rezaee et al, 2008;Stino et al, 2011;Zenginbal, 2015). The grafting techniques vary in many aspects, such as time of the grafting (dormant stage or active growth), type of the tissue (with wood or without wood), the amount of vascular cambium alignment, the quantity of phenolic compounds in scion or stock, and bud numbers in the scion (grafting vs. budding) (ÇElİK, 2000;Kumar and Ananda, 2002;Kümpers and Bishopp, 2015;Mng'omba et al, 2008;Zenginbal, 2015). Environmental conditions including temperature and humidity, may also be vary among grafting and budding (Hartman and Kester, 1997).…”
Section: Grafting Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important factors in graft success is the grafting method. In each crop, a specific grafting method will be more successful than other methods, such as patch budding in the walnut (Karadeniz, 2005), chip budding, and modified cleft grafting in grapes (ÇElİK, 2000;Sabir, 2011), tongue, and wedge grafting in the persimmon (Zenginbal, 2015), tongue grafting in the spur type apples (Kumar and Ananda, 2002) and top-cleft and tongue grafting in tea (Ranjith and Victor, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%