Effects of grazing patterns on grassland biomass and soil environments in China: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Grazing has important influences on the structures and functions of grassland ecosystems, but the effects of grazing patterns on grassland biomass and soil environments in China remain unclear. Objective We employed a meta-analysis to identify the response of biomass and soil environments to different grazing patterns in China. Methods Peer-reviewed journal articles were searched using the Web of Science and China National Knowledge to compile a database. A total of 1011 sets of sample observations satisfied the sampling standards; these were derived from 140 study sites and were obtained from 86 published articles. We conducted random effects meta-analyses and calculated correlation coefficients with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results Grazing significantly decreased the total biomass, aboveground biomass (AGB), belowground biomass (BGB), soil organic matter, soil total nitrogen, soil total phosphorus and soil water content but increased the root-to-shoot ratio, soil available nitrogen, soil pH and bulk density. Generally, increasing grazing intensity and duration significantly increased the effects of grazing on the biomass and soil environment. Additionally, the smallest effects of grazing on the biomass and soil environments were observed under light grazing and cattle grazing alone. Moreover, non-growing season grazing significantly increased AGB, while annual grazing and growing-season grazing significantly reduced AGB. Furthermore, AGB was positively correlated with soil organic matter, soil available phosphorus and bulk density, while BGB was negatively correlated with pH. Conclusions These findings highlight the importance of grazing patterns in the biomass and soil environment response to grazing and suggest that cattle grazing alone and grazing during the non-growing season are beneficial for improving the quality of grassland in China.

Light grazing facilitates carbon accumulation in subsoil in Chinese grasslands: A meta‐analysis

“…The vertical line means RR ++ = 0. HG, heavy grazing; LG, light grazing; MG, moderate grazing [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] (Figure 3), a finding that contradicts several earlier reports (Hao & He, 2019;Ren et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2017). We believe that the difference is due to the fact that the present study also took into account the differences in grazing intensities, whereas many earlier studies had focused only on HG.…”

A global meta-analysis of livestock grazing impacts on soil properties

“…Compared to previous meta-analyses that were limited by region or number of analyzed soil properties [11,12,19,[55][56][57][58], this study provides more insight into global grazing impacts on the soil by combining large-scale data of 15 soil properties.…”

Soil microbial properties of subalpine steppe soils at different grazing intensities in the Chinese Altai Mountains

“…Recent meta-studies have shown that increasing grazing intensities in China generally have a negative impact not only on above—but also on belowground plant biomass 22 , 23 . This can lead to a reduction in plant C allocation and root excretion patterns, having a negative effect on microbial biomass and activity 24 .…”

“…Furthermore, grazing can change the spatial distribution of resources available for soil microorganisms by returning plant biomass in the form of feces and urine to soil 21 , 24 . Depending on stocking densities, the deposition of excrements thereby leads to a heterogeneous concentration of labile carbon and nutrients in the topsoil (0–10 cm) stimulating the soil microbial biomass and its activity at local spots 23 , 27 .…”