1976
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Group Response‐cost Procedures on Cash Shortages in a Small Business

Abstract: The effect of a group response-cost procedure (accompanied by verbal and written instruction) designed to decrease cash shortages in a small business was evaluated with a reversal design. When cash shortages were subtracted from the six employees' salaries on days in which the shortage exceeded 1% of total daily sales, the magnitude of daily shortages sharply decreased. This response-cost contingency was used only three times throughout the study, with a maximum cost of $8.70 per subject over the 41-day period… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controlling influence of the intervention on three dependent variables offers convincing evidence that the independent variable did indeed cause the change in the dependent variables. A few other organizational behavior studies also have demonstrated the applicability of reversals (Gupton & Le Bow, 1971;Kreitner & Golab, 1978;Luthans & Bond, 1977;Luthans & Davis, 1979;Luthans & Maris, 1979;Marholin & Gray, 1976) and multiple baseline designs (Kreitner, Reif, & Morris, 1977;Lamal & Benfield, 1978;Luthans & Davis, 1979;Van Ness & Luthans, 1979). In other words, although considerably more studies need to be done in the future, already there is some evidence that idiographic research of interactive organizational behavior in real settings can be done effectively by single case experimenal designs.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The controlling influence of the intervention on three dependent variables offers convincing evidence that the independent variable did indeed cause the change in the dependent variables. A few other organizational behavior studies also have demonstrated the applicability of reversals (Gupton & Le Bow, 1971;Kreitner & Golab, 1978;Luthans & Bond, 1977;Luthans & Davis, 1979;Luthans & Maris, 1979;Marholin & Gray, 1976) and multiple baseline designs (Kreitner, Reif, & Morris, 1977;Lamal & Benfield, 1978;Luthans & Davis, 1979;Van Ness & Luthans, 1979). In other words, although considerably more studies need to be done in the future, already there is some evidence that idiographic research of interactive organizational behavior in real settings can be done effectively by single case experimenal designs.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A related crime reduction study found that alarms installed in cash drawers activated by the removal of bait money produced an increase in apprehensions but did not reduce robbery incidents (Schnelle et al, 1979). Earlier on, when a response-cost procedure was used (deducting shortages 240 P. D. Luyben from the salaries of a group of employees of a small business), cash shortages declined (Marholin II & Gray, 1976).…”
Section: Crime and Delinquencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting example of the use of response-cost procedures in a small-business setting was provided by Marholin and Gray (1976). These authors found that when cash shortages were subtracted from employees' salaries, the size of the shortage was sharply reduced.…”
Section: Northwestern Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%