2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2013.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of human activity on the distribution and abundance of an endangered Mediterranean high-mountain plant (Erysimum penyalarense)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Amat et al . ). However, there may be other sources of risk such as the disruption of mutualistic interactions.…”
Section: Impacts Of Climate Change On Reproduction and Regeneration Omentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Amat et al . ). However, there may be other sources of risk such as the disruption of mutualistic interactions.…”
Section: Impacts Of Climate Change On Reproduction and Regeneration Omentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We show that pyrophytic species such as Drosophyllum, which respond to indirect fire-related germination cues (e.g., increase in light levels; Correia and Freitas, 2002), may significantly benefit from local-scale disturbances providing such cues. The positive effects of non-fire, anthropogenic disturbances have been largely overlooked in studies examining the distribution of pyrophytes, although such effects are well known in other species (Farris et al, 2009;Amat et al, 2013). However, in a recent study in which the roles of extensive grazing and prescribed burning on heathland biodiversity were examined, Velle et al (2014) highlighted the positive effect of such disturbances on rates of endemism in heathland communities.…”
Section: ⁄⁄mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land use change and modifications of human practices are a major threat to rare species populations in the Mediterranean region (Amat, Vargas, & Gómez, 2013;Andrieu, Thompson, & Debussche, 2007;Domínguez Lozano, Moreno Saiz, & Sainz Ollero, 2003;Gauthier et al, 2017;Hardion et al, 2015;Minuto, Casazza, & Profumo, 2004;Pouget, Baumel, Diadema, & Médail, 2016;Salanon, Gandioli, Kulesza, & Pintaud, 1994). Initially, eight populations were "expected" to have some form of impact and indeed one population of each of S. capensis, O. mitissima and C. lineatus showed a significant decrease in both occupation and abundance, and the latter two populations disappeared before the end of the study.…”
Section: Population Disturbance and Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%