“…Local‐scale studies of habitat use show that these four felids avoid areas with high human impact, but the three smaller ones use human‐modified areas more frequently than do ocelots (Di Bitetti, De Angelo, Di Blanco & Paviolo, ; Kasper, Schneider & Oliveira, ; Rinaldi, Rodriguez, Carvalho & Passos, ). The last pattern could result from interference competition exerted by the ocelot on the smaller felids (the “pardalis” effect; de Oliveira et al., ; Cruz et al., ), whereby ocelots may occur in better conserved areas while the small felids are restricted totally or partially to suboptimal habitats (de Oliveira & Pereira, ; de Oliveira et al., ; Di Bitetti et al., ). In the Atlantic Forest of Argentina, the probability of habitat use by ocelots is negatively affected by habitat changes and anthropic pressures and the probability of habitat use by southern tiger cats is negatively affected by ocelot occupancy probability (Cruz et al., ).…”