2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1393(00)00085-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of in vivo mycorrhization on micropropagated fruit tree rootstocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, survival increase of tissue-cultured saplings by inoculating AM fungi is documented (Monticelli et al 2000;Yano-Melo et al 2003). The two main deficiencies of in vitro grown plants are: 1) a poor control of water loss, and 2) heterotrophic mode of nutrition (Bhojwani, Razdan 1996).…”
Section: Effect Of Nacl On Shoot and Root Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, survival increase of tissue-cultured saplings by inoculating AM fungi is documented (Monticelli et al 2000;Yano-Melo et al 2003). The two main deficiencies of in vitro grown plants are: 1) a poor control of water loss, and 2) heterotrophic mode of nutrition (Bhojwani, Razdan 1996).…”
Section: Effect Of Nacl On Shoot and Root Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycorrhizal symbiosis resulted in significant changes in root system morphology, acclimatization and transplant survival in micropropagated plants (Monticelli et al 2000;Yano-Melo et al 2003). It plays an important role in water economy of plants by improving the hydraulic conductivity of the roots and contributing towards a better uptake of water by the plants even in extremely dry conditions (Al-Karaki et al 2001).…”
Section: Effect Of Seasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lot of research has been carried out to limit the consequences of this phenomenon in orchards (Bechmer et al, 2003;Kowalik et al, 1998;Merwin and Byard, 2001;Reginato et al, 2008;Szczygieł and Zepp, 1998;Tustin et al, 2008;Zydlik, 2004), but fewer studies concern nurseries (Porębski et al, 2003;Simeone et al, 2006). Recently, studies on the use of mycorrhizal inoculum to limit the 'disease' have been carried out (Caruso et al, 1989;Catska, 1994;Catska and Taube--Baab, 1994;Druzic-Orlic et al, 2008;Monticelli et al, 2000;Rutto and Mizutani, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results suggest an interaction between substrate composition, fertilisation and AMF inoculation, as previously reported for micropropagated woody plants (Estaún et al, 1999), since G. deserticola and G. intraradices only improved growth of plants previously cultivated with lower amounts of fertiliser in high-and lowpeat substrates, respectively. Differences in growth promotion of micropropagated plants have been reported for different species of perennial plants (e.g., Monticelli et al, 2000;Taylor and Harrier, 2000;Yano-Melo et al, 1999). Main stem and lateral branch growth was also differentially affected by substrates and AMF inoculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%