2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(02)00718-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of indenter radius on the critical load in scratch testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is, again, in agreement with the results obtained by other authors [6,7]. It must however be taken into account that Ichimura and Ishii [10] also note that the effect of indenter geometry is more noticeable with increasing substrate hardness; therefore, the modified test may be more sensitive to substrate hardness variations compared to a Rockwell C hardness indenter.…”
Section: Room Temperature Scratch Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is, again, in agreement with the results obtained by other authors [6,7]. It must however be taken into account that Ichimura and Ishii [10] also note that the effect of indenter geometry is more noticeable with increasing substrate hardness; therefore, the modified test may be more sensitive to substrate hardness variations compared to a Rockwell C hardness indenter.…”
Section: Room Temperature Scratch Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This difference is due to the different morphology of the tip: compared to the spherical contact generated using a Rockwell C indenter, the modified test generates an entirely different stress field. This is consistent with the existing literature; the effect of indenter radius on critical load has been studied experimentally and analytically by various authors, such as Randall et al [9] or Ichimura and Ishii [10]. These studies conclude that sharper indenters result in significantly reduced failure load; however, rankings obtained using each individual indenter geometry are maintained.…”
Section: Room Temperature Scratch Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The scratch test was initially thought of as primarily an adhesion test, with higher critical loads directly corresponding to more adherent films, but there is now a substantive body of evidence showing that it is the mechanical properties of the film and substrate that exert a significant influence on the deformation behaviour rather than the adhesion strength alone [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. The critical load is dependent on many factors in addition to the interfacial strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is known how the critical force is changed if the measurement conditions are changed, and the values can be converted into those expected from standard measurement, it would require expert knowledge to determine the new rules and their impact on the system, [5,6]. The rules and their weights in the Table 3 are designed in accordance with the expert knowledge and statements in the [3,6,[26][27][28][29][30]]. The new if-then rules of adhesion identified by measured critical force depending on the measurement conditions are mentioned in Table 3, [5,6].…”
Section: Fuzzy Rule Based Expert System For Evaluation Of Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%