2005
DOI: 10.4327/jsnfs.58.307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ingestion of Insoluble Dietary Fiber from Young Barley on Cecal Production of Organic Fatty Acids, Fecal Output and Organ Weight in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Provided that SCFAs are generated from dietary fibers and indigestible carbohydrate by an extensive set of enzymes of gut bacteria, it can be potentially explained that increment of fecal SCFAs by YBL treatment was a consequence of that dietary fibers in YBL were utilized fermentatively with the production of SCFAs in the large intestine. Previous literature by Saito et al (2005) showed that insoluble dietary fiber from young barley had little impact on cecal SCFA levels in a rat model. Given that the soluble type of dietary fibers generally tends to be highly fermentable, it is reasonable to say that the soluble type of dietary fibers from YBL might contribute to the increments of fecal SCFAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Provided that SCFAs are generated from dietary fibers and indigestible carbohydrate by an extensive set of enzymes of gut bacteria, it can be potentially explained that increment of fecal SCFAs by YBL treatment was a consequence of that dietary fibers in YBL were utilized fermentatively with the production of SCFAs in the large intestine. Previous literature by Saito et al (2005) showed that insoluble dietary fiber from young barley had little impact on cecal SCFA levels in a rat model. Given that the soluble type of dietary fibers generally tends to be highly fermentable, it is reasonable to say that the soluble type of dietary fibers from YBL might contribute to the increments of fecal SCFAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%