2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of initial damage on self-healing of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer composites (FA-EGC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the production of ECC typically requires 2 to 3 times more cement than traditional concrete [21]. Given that cement manufacturing is a process with high energy consumption and high carbon dioxide emissions [22], using non-clinker cements (such as geopolymers) to produce EGC represents a promising alternative [23][24][25][26][27][28]. Studies show that compared to the production of ECC, the production of fly ash-based EGC reduces energy consumption by about 60% and carbon dioxide emissions by about 80% [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the production of ECC typically requires 2 to 3 times more cement than traditional concrete [21]. Given that cement manufacturing is a process with high energy consumption and high carbon dioxide emissions [22], using non-clinker cements (such as geopolymers) to produce EGC represents a promising alternative [23][24][25][26][27][28]. Studies show that compared to the production of ECC, the production of fly ash-based EGC reduces energy consumption by about 60% and carbon dioxide emissions by about 80% [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%