1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02202084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of inoculation methods on the incidence of ear-cockle and ‘tundu’ on wheat under field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current taxonomic nomenclature of the pathogen is R. tritici The geographic distribution includes 14 countries: Egypt, Ethiopia, Morocco, Zambia, Afghanistan, China, India, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Cyprus, Australia [60,[86][87][88][89].…”
Section: R Tritici Causative Agent Of Spike Blight Of Wheatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current taxonomic nomenclature of the pathogen is R. tritici The geographic distribution includes 14 countries: Egypt, Ethiopia, Morocco, Zambia, Afghanistan, China, India, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Cyprus, Australia [60,[86][87][88][89].…”
Section: R Tritici Causative Agent Of Spike Blight Of Wheatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. tritici caused reduction in the wheat yield, reaching 57% in mexipak cv. [7], which increased to 75% on the same cultivar in Duhok Province in 1989 [8]. Ami et al [9] reported that the percentage of infestation by galls reached its maximum value (50%) in bread wheat in Bashika, northern Iraq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, R. tritici shows an association with Anguina tritici , a nematode, which produces seed galls (ear cockles) in certain plant varieties and facilitates spread of R. tritici infection ( Paruthi and Bhatti, 1985 ). Intact seed galls produced by nematodes display the greatest grain loss due to development of R. tritici ( Fattah, 1988 ). Similarly, a bacterium, R. toxicus , causing a gumming disease and ryegrass toxicity is associated with a nematode vector ( Riley and Ophel, 1992 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%