2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2019.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Integrated Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Growth Parameters of Rice Varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

14
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that both the grain yield and the growth rate of grain under the NTJ practice were highest, which indicated that different tillage methods and rice varieties had an effect on rice yield. Our results are supported by the finding of previous studies [7,28,29]. Through the interactive analysis of the three influencing factors of tillage method, rice variety, and planting time on grain yield and straw biomass, we found that the tillage methods had a non-significant effect on grain yield and straw biomass (p > 0.05), but rice variety had a significant effect on rice yield (p < 0.05), which is consistent with the results of Qin et al [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that both the grain yield and the growth rate of grain under the NTJ practice were highest, which indicated that different tillage methods and rice varieties had an effect on rice yield. Our results are supported by the finding of previous studies [7,28,29]. Through the interactive analysis of the three influencing factors of tillage method, rice variety, and planting time on grain yield and straw biomass, we found that the tillage methods had a non-significant effect on grain yield and straw biomass (p > 0.05), but rice variety had a significant effect on rice yield (p < 0.05), which is consistent with the results of Qin et al [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Through the interactive analysis of the three influencing factors of tillage method, rice variety, and planting time on grain yield and straw biomass, we found that the tillage methods had a non-significant effect on grain yield and straw biomass (p > 0.05), but rice variety had a significant effect on rice yield (p < 0.05), which is consistent with the results of Qin et al [30]. Rice yield is closely related to factors, such as grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight, seed setting rate, and plant height [28,31]. The yield of rice grain for japonica rice was the highest, and the biomass of straw grown with glutinous rice was the highest, indicating a close relationship between rice variety and rice yield.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We found that both the grain yield and the growth rate of grain under the NTJ practice were highest. Our results are supported by the finding of previous studies [7,33,34]. In terms of nutrient uptake, the no-till practice improved the physical and chemical properties of paddy soil and effectively maintained soil nutrients, which was consistent with the nutrient demand of rice [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although the positive effect on the yield of rice under notill condition was not significant in our study, the practice was deemed successful at maintaining a comparable or higher rice yield, as well as nutrients in the rice soil under certain conditions. Rice yield is closely related to factors such as grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight, seed setting rate, and plant height [33,35]. The yield of rice grain for japonica rice was the highest among different treatments, while the biomass of straw grown with glutinous rice was the highest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rice yield is closely related to factors such as grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight, seed setting rate, and plant height [33,35]. The yield of rice grain for japonica rice was the highest among different treatments, while the biomass of straw grown with glutinous rice was the highest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%