2017
DOI: 10.12681/jhvms.15519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intensity and duration of quantitative restriction of feed on broiler performance

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of physical feed restriction method with different intensity and duration on broiler performance. One hundred and fifty Ross-breed 308 male broiler chicks in a completely randomized design were divided into five experimental treatments. The treatments included physical limitations by 25% or 50% of recommended amount on feed of broilers in two periods of 7 or 14 days. One control group was used fed ad libitum. Each limitation's severity level was appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely to Escherichia coli and total anaerobic bacteria, lactobacillus count could be considered as an index of healthy gut microflora (Cengiz et al, 2012). Inconsistent with the results of Jahanpour et al (2014), the effect of feed restriction on cecal microflora was very limited in our study. Indeed, the intensity of feed restriction of 25% reduced the count of Escherichia coli in comparison with the feed restriction of 12.5% (P¼ 0.04).Total aerobic bacteria count was lower in broiler chicken feed-restricted for 14 d than those restricted for 7 d. Also, the interaction of diet form and duration and intensity of feed restriction was observed (P ¼0.04).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Conversely to Escherichia coli and total anaerobic bacteria, lactobacillus count could be considered as an index of healthy gut microflora (Cengiz et al, 2012). Inconsistent with the results of Jahanpour et al (2014), the effect of feed restriction on cecal microflora was very limited in our study. Indeed, the intensity of feed restriction of 25% reduced the count of Escherichia coli in comparison with the feed restriction of 12.5% (P¼ 0.04).Total aerobic bacteria count was lower in broiler chicken feed-restricted for 14 d than those restricted for 7 d. Also, the interaction of diet form and duration and intensity of feed restriction was observed (P ¼0.04).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…MRS agar (Man Rogosa Sharpe agar, 1.10660.500) to culture lactic acidproducing bacteria, MacConkey agar (105465.0500) to culture coliforms and intestinal negative lactose bacteria was used. Also Nutrient agar (1.05450.0500) was used to culture total aerobic bacteria counts, respectively (Dibaji et al, 2014;Jahanpour et al, 2014).…”
Section: Microbial Sampling and Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study indicated that laying hens undergoing feed restriction during the molting process had decreased microbial diversity, smaller Lactobacillus populations, and higher sensitivity to colonization by Salmonella [ 23 ]. In broilers, studies on the effect of feed restriction on the gut microbiota have been ambiguous [ 24 , 25 ]. It is probable that feed restriction, as a stressor, would alter gut microbial composition in broilers as well as local breeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%